Concurrent assessment of personal, indoor, and outdoor PM 2.5 and PM 1 levels and source contributions using novel low‐cost sensing devices

Shih‐Chun Candice Lung,Ming‐Chien Mark Tsou,Shu‐Chuan Hu,Yu‐Hui Hsieh,Wen‐Cheng Vincent Wang,Chen‐Kai Shui,Chee‐Hong Tan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12763
IF: 6.5539
2020-12-31
Indoor Air
Abstract:<p>The intensity, frequency, duration, and contribution of distinct PM<sub>2.5</sub> sources in Asian households have seldom been assessed; these are evaluated in this work with concurrent personal, indoor, and outdoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>1</sub> monitoring using novel low‐cost sensing (LCS) devices, AS‐LUNG. GRIMM‐comparable observations were acquired by the corrected AS‐LUNG readings, with R<sup>2</sup> up to 0.998. Twenty‐six non‐smoking healthy adults were recruited in Taiwan in 2018 for 7‐day personal, home indoor, and home outdoor PM monitoring. The results showed 5‐min PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>1</sub> exposures of 11.2 ± 10.9 and 10.5 ± 9.8 µg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. Cooking occurred most frequently; cooking with and without solid fuel contributed to high PM<sub>2.5</sub> increments of 76.5 and 183.8 µg/m<sup>3</sup> (1‐min), respectively. Incense burning had the highest mean PM<sub>2.5</sub> indoor/outdoor (1.44 ± 1.44) ratios at home and on average the highest 5‐min PM<sub>2.5</sub> increments (15.0 µg/m<sup>3</sup>) to indoor levels, among all single sources. Certain events accounted for 14.0‐39.6% of subjects' daily exposures. With the high resolution of AS‐LUNG data and detailed time–activity diaries, the impacts of sources and ventilations were assessed in detail.</p>
engineering, environmental,public, environmental & occupational health,construction & building technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?