Negligible Increase in Indoor Endotoxin Activity by 222 nm Far-UVC Illumination on Bioaerosols

Zhancong Liang,Tim Yiu Cheung,Wing Lam Chan,Chee Kent Lim,Alvin. C. K. Lai,Patrick. K. H. Lee,Chak K. Chan,Alvin C.K. Lai,Patrick K.H. Lee,Chak Keung Chan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ea00059a
2023-07-05
Environmental Science: Atmospheres
Abstract:Far-UVC irradiation (222 nm) is an emerging approach for disinfection due to its effectiveness and potentially harmless nature to humans by direct irradiation, compared with other UV wavelengths. However, the indirect risk caused by 222 nm irradiance, such as the changes in inhalation hazard of irradiated bioaerosols, is poorly studied. In particular, gram-negative bacteria (GNB) lysis releases endotoxin, which can cause respiratory diseases via inhalation. We measured the endotoxin activity of illuminated GNB bioaerosol in a chamber using the Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) assay. A 4-fold higher endotoxin activity ratio (EAR) of the UV-irradiated cells to fresh cells was found in GNB bioaerosols illuminated by 222 nm than 254 nm, which can be explained by the different inactivation mechanisms. Compared with 254 nm, 222 nm illumination could excite the cell membrane components (e.g., proteins) more effectively, leading to more reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation and membrane damage, followed by exposing the lipid A to release the free-endotoxin into the aqueous environment of aerosols. The EAR increase, membrane damage, and ROS level at 222 nm were statistically different from 254 nm (p < 0.05). The EAR increased linearly with the UV dose up to 50 mJ/cm 2 . The EAR increase rate constant (kEAR) was insensitive to the KCl concentrations of the aerosols, but it decreased by more than 80% when the droplets became solid particles. At a 222 nm UV dose of 50 mJ/cm 2 , the increase in indoor endotoxin activity due to illuminated GNB in typical indoor environments was estimated to be 3 orders of magnitude lower than the pre-existing endotoxin activity. Our work suggests a negligible increase in endotoxic risk due to 222 nm indoor disinfection.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?