Abstract:Purpose With over 3,000 academic journals in the fields of Business and Economics, most academics face a hard time selecting an adequate journal to submit their work to. In today's demanding academic environment and with the presence of different journal ranking lists (JRLs), the selection becomes more difficult when considering employment, promotion and funding. The purpose of this paper is to explore key differences among multiple JRLs pertinent to the latter common objectives. An extensive analysis is conducted to compare the content of journals in the Australian Business Deans Council (ABDC) Journal Quality list, Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) in the fields of Business and Economics. Then, a case of a university with medium research output is considered where scholarly performance evaluation is based on the ABDC Journal Quality List. Design/methodology/approach After ranking journals in the fields of Business and Economics based on SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) indicator, JCR's Journal Impact Factor (JIF) and JCR's Eigenfactor (EF), a methodology is proposed to categorize journals in the three JRLs into the same categorization adopted by ABDC. The latter establishes a way to compare the four JRLs under consideration and serves as a basis to compare and analyze the content of journals in the ABDC Journal Quality list, Scopus and WoS. As a proxy impact metric, a normalized citation count is associated with each article based on Google Scholar. The publications of the considered university are then evaluated from the perspective of the four JRLs in terms of citation-based impact and quality while considering the exposure to popular world university ranking tables. Findings For journals classified under fourth tier by ABDC, over 53 and 59% are not indexed by Scopus and WoS, respectively. In this case study, over 42% of the publications appear in journals that are not listed in JCR despite the fact that over 94% of them are listed by the SJR list. Generally, publications that appear in journals listed by JCR achieve, on a yearly average, significantly higher citation rates when compared to those that appear in journals listed in ABDC and SJR Lists. Originality/value A four-tier mapping is proposed for consistent comparison among JRLs. Normalized citation count associated with each article based on Google Scholar is employed for evaluation. The findings provide recommendations for scholars, administrators and global universities, including Euro-Med Universities, on which JRL can be more influential for both faculty development and positioning of the university.

An ablation study on the use of publication venue quality to rank computer science departments

Venue Analytics: A Simple Alternative to Citation-Based Metrics

Scholar Ranking 2023: Ranking of Computer Science Departments Based on Faculty Citations

The impact of conference ranking systems in computer science: a comparative regression analysis

Faculty citation measures are highly correlated with peer assessment of computer science doctoral programs

Quality related publication categories in social sciences and humanities, based on a university's peer review assessments

A Graph Analytics Framework for Ranking Authors, Papers and Venues

Which journal ranking list? A case study in business and economics

Poincare: Recommending Publication Venues via Treatment Effect Estimation

“I'd like to publish in Q1, but there's no Q1 to be found”: Study of journal quartile distributions across subject categories and topics

Measuring the academic reputation through citation networks via PageRank

Categorization and correlational analysis of quality factors influencing citation

Journal rank in the Science and Technology domain: A lightweight quantitative approach for evaluation

RelRank: A relevance-based author ranking algorithm for individual publication venues

Do PageRank-based author rankings outperform simple citation counts?

Curricular Complexity Versus Quality of Computer Science Programs

R-Score: Reputation-based Scoring of Research Groups

Quality versus quantity in scientific impact

Citation regression analysis of computer science publications in different ranking categories and subfields

Academic Ranking with Web Mining and Axiomatic Analysis

$C^3$-index: A PageRank based multi-faceted metric for authors' performance measurement