Abstract:Atmospheric transport models are a source of uncertainty in the diagnostics of the CO2 sources and sinks. We propose here a protocol to compare two transport models: a 2-dimensional (2D) and a 3-dimensional (3D) model based on 3 different experiments that reveal the ability of each model to account for the different components of the atmospheric carbon cycle. The 2D model we use is the one described by Tans et al. and the 3D model is the TM2 model, developed by Heimann et al. First, we conduct the same fossil fuel experiment in both models and show that the 2D model has a stronger inter-hemispheric mixing than the 3D model (similar to 25%), even though the 2D model presents a weaker intra-hemispheric mixing above source regions (experiment A). The influence of year-to-year variability of transport on the latitudinal profile in fossil-fuel CO2 appears to be weak for the 1990s. We then use a set of ''all but fossil fuel'' fluxes, originally inferred from the 2D model, as an input to the 3D model (experiment B). Even if the main discrepancy on the resulting latitudinal CO2 concentrations occurs between the 2D and 3D models in the tropics and at the mid-northern latitudes, the differences implied by three longitudinal distributions tested in the 3D model are important and can be explained by a few global transport mechanisms. Finally, we quantify the differences in latitudinal CO2 concentrations observed in experiment B in terms of net carbon fluxes at the surface. To do so, an inverse calculation of the CO2 fluxes in latitude and time is performed with the 3D model, using as an input a smoothed latitudinal profile of atmospheric measurements for the period 1990-1993 (experiment C=A+B). We find with the 3D model that, averaged on the period 1990-93, the equatorial release is reduced by 40 Tmol yr(-1) (roughly 25% of the original source) compared with the initial 2D budget and is shifted southward by roughly 10 degrees. The mid northern latitude sink is also reduced by 80 Tmol yr(-1) (roughly 25% of the original sink). In summary, this study shows that the changes in the carbon budget required when moving from the 2D model to this 3D model are important, but they are not radical changes.

Dependence of Northern Hemisphere Tropospheric Transport on the Midlatitude Jet under Abrupt CO2 Increase

Coupled Stratospheric Ozone and Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation Feedbacks on the Northern Hemisphere Midlatitude Jet Response to 4xCO2

Dependence of atmospheric transport into the Arctic on the meridional extent of the Hadley cell

Climate Response to Latitudinal and Altitudinal Distribution of Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosols

Dependence of Climate Forcing and Response on the Altitude of Black Carbon Aerosols

Dynamics of Southern Hemisphere Atmospheric Circulation Response to Anthropogenic Aerosol Forcing

Effects of sea surface temperature and greenhouse gas changes on the transport between the stratosphere and troposphere

Diagnosis of Zonal Mean Relative Humidity Changes in A Warmer Climate

Comparison of Climate Response to Anthropogenic Aerosol Versus Greenhouse Gas Forcing: Distinct Patterns

Are the Transient and Equilibrium Climate Change Patterns Similar in Response to Increased CO2?

Climate Response to the Spatial and Temporal Evolutions of Anthropogenic Aerosol Forcing

Changes in Clouds and Atmospheric Circulation Associated with Rapid Adjustment Induced by Increased Atmospheric CO2: a Multiscale Modeling Framework Study

Increased Global Land Carbon Sink Due to Aerosol‐Induced Cooling

Influence of Two Atmospheric Transport Models on Inferring Sources and Sinks of Atmospheric Co2

Quantifying the Summertime Response of the Austral Jet Stream and Hadley Cell to Stratospheric Ozone and Greenhouse Gases

Changes in Concentrations of Fine and Coarse Particles under the CO2-induced Global Warming

Air Pollution and Climate Response to Aerosol Direct Radiative Effects: A Modeling Study of Decadal Trends Across the Northern Hemisphere

Response of the Midlatitude Jets, and of Their Variability, to Increased Greenhouse Gases in the CMIP5 Models

Is a high‐altitude meteorological analysis necessary to simulate thermosphere‐stratosphere coupling?

Seasonal Variations in Anthropogenic and Natural Particles Induced by Rising CO2 Levels

Understanding the Atmospheric Temperature Adjustment to CO2 Perturbation at the Process Level