Subject, function, and trend in medical ethics research: a comparative study of Chinese and non-Chinese literature using bibliometrics.
Lanhui Jiang,Jiantong Shen,Youping Li,Shaolin Deng,Taixiang Wu,Baoqing Chen,Zhiyi Xie,Chaoyi Qin,Zhiyuan Yu,Chuan Qin,Jin Huang,Xuemei Liu,Yan Li,Jie Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-5391.2012.01178.x
2012-01-01
Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
Abstract:To perform a comparative quantitative and qualitative analysis of Chinese and non-Chinese medical ethics literature using systematic research and literature analysis in order to discern research trends in the area and provide baseline data as a reference for relevant decision making and further study.We retrieved articles using MeSH terms and keywords related to medical ethics in PubMed and CNKI, and then constructed a set of charts by applying word co-occurrence, The Pathfinder Networks algorithms, an included subject chart, a research field relationship chart, and strategy coordination charts.The total of number of papers retrieved from PubMed was six times that retrieved from CNKI. Outside China, medical ethics has been studied in eight fully shaped subject fields, including morals, ethical review, physician-patient relationships, clinical trials, euthanasia, ethics education, clinical ethics, and health policy. In contrast, medical ethics research in China is still confined to five subject fields: morals, physician-patient relations, medical ethics education, ethical review, and medical research.Medical ethics research outside China emphasizes the application of medical ethics to solve emerging problems in clinical and medical research. It is mainly centered on morals, ethical review, and physician-patient relations. By comparison, medical ethics research in China places greater emphasis on morals and medical education. In order to narrow this gap between China and other countries, we should broaden the research scope of medical ethics and add more applied research, such as ethical review and medical education.