Evaluation of the use of chamomile in isolation and in association with laser photobiomodulation in the healing of rats oral mucosa
Tila Fortuna,Juliana Borges Dantas,Rejane Conceição Santana,Hortência Resende Della Cella,Elisângela de Jesus Campos,Gabriela Botelho Martins
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/php.13901
2024-01-21
Photochemistry and Photobiology
Abstract:Wistar rats received a standardized wound on tongue dorsum and were allocated into experimental groups: Control (G1), Chamomile Fluid extract (G2), Chamomile Infusion (G3), Laser (G4), Chamomile Infusion + Laser (G5) to evaluate tissue repair of rats under topical use of chamomile alone and in association with PBM. Euthanasia was on days 3, 7, and 14 after surgery. Ulcers were measured with a caliper for clinical analysis. Sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin and Sirius Red allowed histomorphometric analyses. Laser photobiomodulation (LPBM) has been shown to be one of the possible modulating agents of inflammation. Similarly, medicinal plants, such as chamomile (Matricaria recutita) are also used with the same purpose. To evaluate tissue repair in the dorsum of the tongue of rats under topical use of chamomile alone and in association with LPBM. Seventy‐five male Wistar rats received a standardized wound on the dorsum of the tongue and were allocated into experimental groups: Control (G1), Chamomile Fluid extract (G2), Chamomile Infusion (G3), Laser (G4), Chamomile Infusion + Laser (G5). Euthanasia was done on days 3, 7, and 14 after surgery. Ulcers were evaluated and measured with a caliper. Sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin and Picrosirius Red allowed evaluation of edema, inflammatory infiltrate, cellularity, and re‐epithelialization and characterization of total collagen. Histomorphometric analysis of the percentage of total collagen, the distance from the basal layer to the epithelial surface, and the thickness of the stratum corneum were performed. The G2 and G4 groups modulated the exudative and proliferative phases of inflammation, both clinically and histologically. The G3 and G5 groups did not show significant differences in relation to the G1 group in most of the evaluated parameters. Chamomile fluid extract and LPBM alone showed better clinical and histological responses for tissue repair than the association between these therapeutic modalities. There were differences in the parameters of clinical, histological, and histomorphometric patterns between the experimental groups of the present investigation. The LPBM proved to be superior in the performed analysis.
biochemistry & molecular biology,biophysics