Abstract:There has been a major shift in research on human reasoning toward Bayesian and probabilistic approaches, which has been called a new paradigm. The new paradigm sees most everyday and scientific reasoning as taking place in a context of uncertainty, and inference is from uncertain beliefs and not from arbitrary assumptions. In this manuscript we present an empirical test of normative standards in the new paradigm using a novel probabilized conditional reasoning task. Our results indicated that for everyday conditional with at least a weak causal connection between antecedent and consequent only the conditional probability of the consequent given antecedent contributes unique variance to predicting the probability of conditional, but not the probability of the conjunction, nor the probability of the material conditional. Regarding normative accounts of reasoning, we found significant evidence that participants' responses were confidence preserving (i.e., p-valid in the sense of Adams, 1998) for MP inferences, but not for MT inferences. Additionally, only for MP inferences and to a lesser degree for DA inferences did the rate of responses inside the coherence intervals defined by mental probability logic (Pfeifer and Kleiter, 2005, 2010) exceed chance levels. In contrast to the normative accounts, the dual-source model (Klauer et al., 2010) is a descriptive model. It posits that participants integrate their background knowledge (i.e., the type of information primary to the normative approaches) and their subjective probability that a conclusion is seen as warranted based on its logical form. Model fits showed that the dual-source model, which employed participants' responses to a deductive task with abstract contents to estimate the form-based component, provided as good an account of the data as a model that solely used data from the probabilized conditional reasoning task.

Intercausal Reasoning with Uninstantiated Ancestor Nodes

Contiguity and covariation in human causal inference

A Quantum Probability Model of Causal Reasoning

"Conditional Inter-Causally Independent" Node Distributions, a Property of "Noisy-Or" Models

Causal intuition in the indefinite world: Meta-analysis and simulations

Too Fast Causal Inference under Causal Insufficiency

Reinterpreting causal discovery as the task of predicting unobserved joint statistics

Causal inference using the algorithmic Markov condition

Reasoning about causal relationships: Inferences on causal networks.

A category theoretical argument for causal inference

Algorithms for Causal Reasoning in Probability Trees

Causal Inference under Interference and Model Uncertainty

From Checking to Inference: Actual Causality Computations as Optimization Problems

New normative standards of conditional reasoning and the dual-source model

Learning Causal Structures Based on Divide and Conquer

Learning Deterministic Causal Relations

The Odyssey of Commonsense Causality: From Foundational Benchmarks to Cutting-Edge Reasoning

Conditional independences and causal relations implied by sets of equations

On the Complexity of Counterfactual Reasoning

Extending a rational process model of causal reasoning: Assessing Markov violations and explaining away with inhibitory causal relations.