Abstract:Purpose This study addressed the utilisation of machine learning techniques to estimate tear osmolarity, a clinically significant yet challenging parameter to measure accurately. Elevated tear osmolarity has been observed in contact lens wearers and is associated with contact lens‐induced dry eye, a common cause of discomfort leading to discontinuation of lens wear. Methods The study explored machine learning, regression and classification techniques to predict tear osmolarity using routine clinical parameters. The data set consisted of 175 participants, primarily healthy subjects eligible for soft contact lens wear. Various clinical assessments were performed, including symptom assessment with the Ocular Surface Disease Index and 5‐Item Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ‐5), tear meniscus height (TMH), tear osmolarity, non‐invasive keratometric tear film break‐up time (NIKBUT), ocular redness, corneal and conjunctival fluorescein staining and Meibomian glands loss. Results The results revealed that simple linear regression was insufficient for accurate osmolarity prediction. Instead, more advanced regression models achieved a moderate level of predictive power, explaining approximately 32% of the osmolarity variability. Notably, key predictors for osmolarity included NIKBUT, TMH, ocular redness, Meibomian gland coverage and the DEQ‐5 questionnaire. In classification tasks, distinguishing between low ( 308 mOsmol/L) levels yielded an accuracy of approximately 80%. Key parameters for classification were similar to those in regression models, emphasising the importance of NIKBUT, TMH, ocular redness, Meibomian glands coverage and the DEQ‐5 questionnaire. Conclusions This study highlights the potential benefits of integrating machine learning into contact lens research and practice. It suggests the clinical utility of assessing Meibomian glands and NIKBUT in contact lens fitting and follow‐up visits. Machine learning models can optimise contact lens prescriptions and aid in early detection of conditions like dry eye, ultimately enhancing ocular health and the contact lens wearing experience.

Estimating basal tear osmolarity in normal and dry eye subjects

Basal Tear Osmolarity as a metric to estimate body hydration and dry eye severity

Tear Osmolarity in the Diagnosis of Systemic Dehydration and Dry Eye Disease

Evaluating the Efficacy of the Diluted Schirmer Method for Tear Collection in Dry Eye Syndrome Patients

Daytime Variations of Tear Osmolarity and Tear Meniscus Volume.

Tear film osmolarity and dry eye disease: a review of the literature

Conjunctivochalasis and Tear Osmolarity Are Associated With Reduced Conjunctival Epithelial Thickness in Dry Eye

A Comprehensive Study on Tear Meniscus Height Inter-Eye Differences in Aqueous Deficient Dry Eye Diagnosis

Association of Tear Osmolarity With Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye Disease in the Dry Eye Assessment and Management (DREAM) Study

Influential Signs of Dry Eye–Related Ocular Symptoms in Participants With Unstable Tear Film

Objective Optical Assessment Of Tear-Film Quality Dynamics In Patients With Meibomian Gland Dysfunction And Aqueous-Deficient Dry Eye Optical Quality Changes In Different Dry Eye Subtypes

Immediate Impact on Tear Osmolarity Following the Application of Different Ocular Lubricants in Patients Experiencing Moderate Dry Eye Symptoms

Machine learning‐based prediction of tear osmolarity for contact lens practice

Effect of tear hyperosmolarity and signs of clinical ocular surface pathology upon conjunctival goblet cell function in the human ocular surface

Expression of Lipid Peroxidation Markers in the Tear Film and Ocular Surface of Patients with Non-Sjogren Syndrome: Potential Biomarkers for Dry Eye Disease

Leptin’s Concentration in Tears and Dry Eye: a Clinical Observational Study

Model for Ocular Tear Film Function

Meibum Lipidomic Analysis in Evaporative Dry Eye Subjects

Osmolality and tear film dynamics

Evaluations of Tear Protein Markers in Dry Eye Disease: Repeatability of Measurement and Correlation with Disease