Abstract:The rapid progress in implementing Artificial Intelligence (AI) across various domains such as healthcare decision-making, medical diagnosis, and others has raised significant concerns regarding the fairness and bias embedded within AI systems. This is particularly crucial in sectors like healthcare, employment, criminal justice, credit scoring, and the emerging field of generative AI models (GenAI) producing synthetic media. Such systems can lead to unfair outcomes and perpetuate existing inequalities, including biases ingrained in the synthetic data representation of individuals.This survey paper provides a concise yet comprehensive examination of fairness and bias in AI, encompassing their origins, ramifications, and potential mitigation strategies. We scrutinize sources of bias, including data, algorithmic, and human decision biases, shedding light on the emergent issue of generative AI bias where models may replicate and amplify societal stereotypes. Assessing the societal impact of biased AI systems, we spotlight the perpetuation of inequalities and the reinforcement of harmful stereotypes, especially as generative AI gains traction in shaping public perception through generated content.Various proposed mitigation strategies are explored, with an emphasis on the ethical considerations surrounding their implementation. We stress the necessity of interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure the effectiveness of these strategies. Through a systematic literature review spanning multiple academic disciplines, we define AI bias and its various types, delving into the nuances of generative AI bias. We discuss the adverse effects of AI bias on individuals and society, providing an overview of current approaches to mitigate bias, including data preprocessing, model selection, and post-processing. Unique challenges posed by generative AI models are highlighted, underscoring the importance of tailored strategies to address them effectively.Addressing bias in AI necessitates a holistic approach, involving diverse and representative datasets, enhanced transparency, and accountability in AI systems, and exploration of alternative AI paradigms prioritizing fairness and ethical considerations. This survey contributes to the ongoing discourse on developing fair and unbiased AI systems by outlining the sources, impacts, and mitigation strategies related to AI bias, with a particular focus on the burgeoning field of generative AI.

Plato's Shadows in the Digital Cave: Controlling Cultural Bias in Generative AI

Social Risks in the Era of Generative AI

Communicating the cultural other: trust and bias in generative AI and large language models

From human-centered to social-centered artificial intelligence: Assessing ChatGPT's impact through disruptive events

Should ChatGPT be Biased? Challenges and Risks of Bias in Large Language Models

Stars, Stripes, and Silicon: Unravelling the ChatGPT's All-American, Monochrome, Cis-centric Bias

Exploring Ethical Dimensions in AI: Navigating Bias and Fairness in the Field

Approaches to Generative Artificial Intelligence, A Social Justice Perspective

Laissez-Faire Harms: Algorithmic Biases in Generative Language Models

Biases in Generative Art -- A Causal Look from the Lens of Art History

From Melting Pots to Misrepresentations: Exploring Harms in Generative AI

Examining Ethical Aspects of AI: Addressing Bias and Equity in the Discipline

Bias in Generative AI

Generative Discrimination: What Happens When Generative AI Exhibits Bias, and What Can Be Done About It

Generative Artificial Intelligence and Copyright: Both Sides of the Black Box

The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in the Era of Generative AI

From Bytes to Biases: Investigating the Cultural Self-Perception of Large Language Models

Algorithmic bias: on the implicit biases of social technology

BiasTestGPT: Using ChatGPT for Social Bias Testing of Language Models

Generative AI in Writing Research Papers: A New Type of Algorithmic Bias and Uncertainty in Scholarly Work

Rolling in the deep of cognitive and AI biases