0233 Actigraphy-derived Sleep Profiles in Older Men: Insights into Cognitive and Cardiovascular Health Risks
Clemence Cavailles,Meredith Wallace,Yue Leng,Katie Stone,Sonia Ancoli-Israel,Kristine Yaffe
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0233
IF: 6.313
2024-04-20
SLEEP
Abstract:Abstract Introduction While growing attention has been given to understanding the multidimensionality of sleep, research has primarily focused on individual sleep characteristics. Therefore, the link between actigraphy-derived 24-hour sleep/circadian profiles and the incidence of dementia and cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in healthy older men remains unexplored. Methods We analyzed actigraphy-derived sleep/circadian data gathered from 2,667 men participating in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Sleep study. Sleep/circadian profiles were determined using multiple coalesced generalized hyperbolic mixture modeling, based on 20 sleep parameters and circadian activity rhythms variables. Multivariable Cox models were performed to investigate how these sleep profiles related to the incidence of dementia and CVD events over a 12-year period. Results We identified three sleep profiles: active healthy sleepers (characterized by high sleep efficiency; strong circadian rhythmicity; and high activity during wake periods), fragmented poor sleepers (low sleep efficiency; high sleep fragmentation; short sleep duration; and weak circadian rhythmicity), and nappers (more frequent and longer naps; and high sleep efficiency). Over the 12-year follow-up, compared to active healthy sleepers, fragmented poor sleepers had significantly increased risks of dementia and CVD events (Hazard Ratio (HR)= 1.47, 95% confidence interval (CI)= 1.08;1.98 and HR=1.34, 95%= 1.11;1.63, respectively), whereas nappers had a higher risk of CVD events (HR= 1.18, 95% CI= 1.00; 1.40) but not dementia incidence (HR= 1.14, 95%CI= 0.87;1.49). Conclusion In older men, fragmented poor sleepers’ profile was associated with less favorable cognitive and cardiovascular health over 12-year follow-up, indicating a potential target for sleep intervention. Nappers’ profile was linked to increased risk of CVD events incidence, but not with the incidence of dementia. These results suggest that different sleep profiles may influence cognitive and cardiovascular health through distinct mechanisms. Support (if any)
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?