Multi‐institutional Validation of the Interarytenoid Assessment Protocol for Pediatric Laryngeal Cleft

Jennifer M. Siu,Shaunak Amin,Evan J. Propst,Nikolaus E. Wolter,Jeremy Prager,Michelle Wyatt,Claire Lawlor,Douglas Sidell,Deepak Mehta,Reema Padia,Nicholas Smith,Christopher Hartnick,Catherine K. Hart,Xing Wang,Kaalan Johnson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31866
IF: 2.97
2024-11-18
The Laryngoscope
Abstract:Multi‐institutional validation of the Interarytenoid Assessment Protocol demonstrates strong inter‐ and intra‐rater reliability for assessment of IAMH. Standardization of anatomical evaluations may improve our ability to perform more reliable outcomes studies of pediatric pharyngeal dysphagia in the future. Background Current assessment techniques for determining whether a patient has normal interarytenoid anatomy, a deep interarytenoid notch, or a minor laryngeal cleft are highly variable. However, differentiating between these three entities is important, given it may distinguish whether a patient should be considered for surgical intervention. The Interarytenoid Assessment Protocol (IAAP) was developed to provide standardization of interarytenoid anatomy evaluations. We aimed to assess the reliability of the IAAP for assessment of interaytenoid mucosal height (IAMH) through a multi‐institutional validation study. Methods Reliability of the IAAP was assessed by 10 pediatric otolaryngologists all from different academic centers. 30 de‐identified endoscopic videos of interarytenoid assessments were rated at two separate time points, 2 months apart. Intra‐class correlation (ICC) coefficients with two‐way models were used to evaluate inter‐ and intra‐rater reliability. Results Thirty endoscopic videos were collected for patients with a median (IQR) age of 4.9 years (59 months; range: 1 month to 20 years). On the first video assessment, inter‐rater reliability was 0.74 (95% CI 0.63–0.84), and on the second video assessment, inter‐rater reliability was 0.75 (95% CI 0.63–0.85) indicating strong inter‐rater reliability. Overall intra‐rater test–retest reliability was 0.75 (95% CI 0.69–0.79) indicating strong agreement. In almost half, 14 (46.6%) raters chose IAAP classification levels within 1 level of each other. Conclusions Multi‐institutional validation of the IAAP demonstrates strong inter‐ and intra‐rater reliability for assessment of IAMH when evaluated through pictorial analysis. Standardization of anatomical evaluations may improve our ability to perform more reliable outcomes studies of pediatric pharyngeal dysphagia in the future. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope, 2024
medicine, research & experimental,otorhinolaryngology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?