Antecedents of artificial intelligence and learners demographic characteristics in higher education: implication for human resource managers
Atadika, Dzifa,Anim, Akua Neene
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06732-9
IF: 2.8
2024-09-25
Current Psychology
Abstract:This study examined the effect of demographic characteristics on the antecedents of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education. These antecedents, also known as dimensions of AI in this study, were AI platform patronization, AI usage, AI benefits and AI challenges experienced by graduate students in higher education. The study was guided by the positivist philosophical position and the quantitative approach as well as the explanatory study design. The study sampled 294 graduates out of a population of 1189 graduates from a public university. Stratified sampling was employed to determine the level and types of academic programs pursued and the participants' gender. A structured questionnaire was used to gather data for the study. The data gathered were analyzed with descriptive statistics such as frequencies and percentages for demographic characteristics, and inferential statistics such as t-test statistics and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to address the hypotheses guiding the study. Statistical tools (t-test statistics and ANOVA) were used to examine how demographic characteristics such as gender, academic programs and academic level influenced the adoption of AI platforms, AI usage, AI benefits and AI challenges among graduate students. The study revealed that there was a significant difference between the sex of graduate students and the antecedents of AI, such as ChatGPT, Quillbot, AI usage, and AI benefits, among graduate students. There were also significant differences between programs pursued in graduate studies and AI antecedents such as ChatGPT, Quillbot, AI usage, AI benefits, and AI challenges. Finally, the study revealed that the level of academic programs influenced the appreciation of AI tools such as ChatGPT and Quillbot and the challenges associated with AI in higher education. The results indicate that AI usage and its associated benefits differ among graduate students in terms of gender. The study concluded that its findings have practical, theoretical, and policy implications for university administrators in higher education. It was therefore recommended that the Deans and Registrars of Graduate Schools in Developing Economies provide clear gendered policy and support systems for AI usage in higher education. Thus, AI policies should address disparities between male and female graduate students in terms of usage, challenges and benefits.
psychology, multidisciplinary