Abstract:To facilitate developers in effective allocation of their testing and debugging efforts, many software defect prediction techniques have been proposed in the literature. These techniques can be used to predict classes that are more likely to be buggy based on the past history of classes, methods, or certain other code elements. These techniques are effective provided that a sufficient amount of data is available to train a prediction model. However, sufficient training data are rarely available for new software projects. To resolve this problem, cross-project defect prediction, which transfers a prediction model trained using data from one project to another, was proposed and is regarded as a new challenge in the area of defect prediction. Thus far, only a few cross-project defect prediction techniques have been proposed. To advance the state of the art, in this study, we investigated seven composite algorithms that integrate multiple machine learning classifiers to improve cross-project defect prediction. To evaluate the performance of the composite algorithms, we performed experiments on 10 open-source software systems from the PROMISE repository, which contain a total of 5,305 instances labeled as defective or clean. We compared the composite algorithms with the combined defect predictor where logistic regression is used as the meta classification algorithm (CODEP (Logistic) ), which is the most recent cross-project defect prediction algorithm in terms of two standard evaluation metrics: cost effectiveness and F-measure. Our experimental results show that several algorithms outperform CODEP (Logistic) : Maximum voting shows the best performance in terms of F-measure and its average F-measure is superior to that of CODEP (Logistic) by 36.88%. Bootstrap aggregation (Bagging (J48)) shows the best performance in terms of cost effectiveness and its average cost effectiveness is superior to that of CODEP (Logistic) by 15.34%.

Implicit and explicit mixture of experts models for software defect prediction

Combined Classifier for Cross-Project Defect Prediction: an Extended Empirical Study.

MoDE: A Mixture-of-Experts Model with Mutual Distillation among the Experts

Understanding machine learning software defect predictions

A hybrid‐ensemble model for software defect prediction for balanced and imbalanced datasets using AI‐based techniques with feature preservation: SMERKP‐XGB

AdapMoE: Adaptive Sensitivity-based Expert Gating and Management for Efficient MoE Inference

Software Defect Prediction Using an Intelligent Ensemble-Based Model

An Approach to Semantic and Structural Features Learning for Software Defect Prediction

Contextual Mixture of Experts: Integrating Knowledge into Predictive Modeling

A Novel Multiple Ensemble Learning Models Based on Different Datasets for Software Defect Prediction

Explainable Software Defect Prediction from Cross Company Project Metrics Using Machine Learning

Semantic and traditional feature fusion for software defect prediction using hybrid deep learning model

Software Defect Prediction Model Using AdaBoost based Random Forest Technique

IMDAC: A robust intelligent software defect prediction model via multi‐objective optimization and end‐to‐end hybrid deep learning networks

Deep Learning Based Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery Software Defect Prediction with Effective Optimization Strategy

A New Improved Prediction of Software Defects Using Machine Learning-based Boosting Techniques with NASA Dataset

MoC-System: Efficient Fault Tolerance for Sparse Mixture-of-Experts Model Training

Discriminating features-based cost-sensitive approach for software defect prediction

Beyond Parameter Count: Implicit Bias in Soft Mixture of Experts

HMoE: Heterogeneous Mixture of Experts for Language Modeling

Boosting multi-objective just-in-time software defect prediction by fusing expert metrics and semantic metrics