Abstract:BACKGROUND CONTEXT There is a paucity of data examining anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with (ALIF-PLF) or without (standalone, sa-ALIF) posterior fixation for treatment for low-grade (grade I or II) isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS); hence, it remains a topical debate amongst spine surgeons. Correcting pathology with sa-ALIF reduces costs, operative times, and posterior access complications. PURPOSE This study assesses sa-ALIF outcomes for low-grade IS and evaluates the need for posterior fixation based on comparison to an ALIF-PLF cohort. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Comparative prospective analysis of cohort data. PATIENT SAMPLE Consecutive patients from 1 senior spine surgeon performing sa-ALIF or ALIF-PLF for management of low-grade IS between December 2013-2022. All patients had a normal sacral slope (<40 o ) and bone density on DEXA assessed radiographically preoperatively. Patients with a BMI >35 kg/m 2 were excluded. OUTCOME MEASURES Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected at 6-week, 6-month, 12-month, and final follow-up time points. Computed tomography (CT) imaging conducted at either 6-, 12- or 24-months for interbody fusion status. METHODS Patient demographics recorded at baseline. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected at 6-week, 6-month, 12-month, and final follow-up time points. The timepoint of greatest clinical interest was 12-months. Computed tomography (CT) imaging conducted at either 6-, 12- or 24-months for interbody fusion status. RESULTS The cohort consisted of 32 patients (sa-ALIF 13, ALIF-PLF 19) with similar demographics. Mean age and BMI (sex) of sa-ALIF vs ALIF-PLF cohort was 44.1±12.1 years and 24.0±3.6 kg/m 2 (61.5% male) vs 49.6±11.9 years and 26.0±2.8 kg/m 2 (63.2% male). Only 3 participants were current smokers (sa-ALIF n=1). There were 2 double level procedures at L4/5 and L5/S1 with the remaining operated at L5/S1. There was 26 grade I IS (sa-ALIF 12, ALIF-PLF 14) and grade II IS (sa-ALIF 1, ALIF-PLF 5) participants. Between groups, there were no significant differences (p=0.05) in mean baseline PROMs, fusion time, estimated blood loss, and PROMs at all follow-up time points except for 6-weeks. Fusion was achieved at 6-months in 40.6% (sa-ALIF 53.8%, ALIF-PLF 31.6%), 12-/24-months in 93.8% (sa-ALIF 92.3%, ALIF-PLF 94.7%) of patients. Only 2 patients (1 in each group) with grade I IS remained unfused over the follow-up period. Both groups' PROMs significantly decreased to 12-months postoperatively. Six-week mean postoperative PROMs in sa-ALIF and ALIF-PLF groups respectively were; VAS leg (2.5±2.3 vs 4.9±1.7, p=0.002), VAS back (3.5±1.4 vs 3.4±1.9, p=0.9), ODI (16.3±7.5 vs 21.2±5.4, p=0.05), SF-12 physical (43.1±6.5 vs 36.0±4.6, p=0.0014), and SF-12 mental (56.5±7.5 vs 54.0±4.5, p=0.3). A total of 15.4% vs 21.1% of patients suffered complications in the sa-ALIF and ALIF-PLF groups. The ALIF-PLF cohort had one posterior fixation revision. CONCLUSIONS In selected patients with normal bone density and sacral slope with a BMI <35kg/m 2 , sa-ALIF is a safe (less complications) and effective (faster fusion rates, recovery of PROMs) treatment option for low grade IS without the need for supplementary posterior fixation. FDA Device/Drug Status This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

P76. Return to activity after thoracic anterior lumbar posterior tethering versus posterior spinal fusion

Combined Anterior Thoracic Vertebral Body Tethering and Posterior Lumbar Tethering Results in Quicker Return to Sport and Activity Compared to Posterior Spinal Instrumented Fusion in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Posterior-only approach with selective segmental TLIF for degenerative lumbar scoliosis.

Anterior Selective Lumbar Fusion Saving More Distal Fusion Segments Compared with Posterior Approach in the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with Lenke Type 5: A Cohort Study with More Than 8-Year Follow-up

54. Perioperative outcomes of anterior vertebral spinal tethering vs posterior spinal fusion for skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis

Radiographic and perioperative outcomes following anterior thoracic vertebral body tethering and posterior lumbar spine tethering: a pilot series

Results of posterior spinal fusion after failed anterior vertebral body tethering

Posterolateral lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis

Anterior vertebral body tethering shows clinically comparable shoulder balance outcomes to posterior spinal fusion

[Anterior Endoscopic Release/posterior Spinal Instrumentation for Severe and Rigid Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis].

Radiological and Pulmonary Results of Surgical Treatment of Severe Idiopathic Scoliosis Using Preoperative Halo Gravity Traction Compared with Less Invasive Temporary Internal Distraction in Staged Surgery in Adolescents

Spinal range of motion, muscle endurance, and back pain and function at least 20 years after fusion or brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case-control study

Return to Activities of Daily Living After Fusion to the Pelvis for Adult Spinal Deformity

Long-term Outcomes of Tibial Spine Avulsion Fractures After Open Reduction With Osteosuturing Versus Arthroscopic Screw Fixation: A Multicenter Comparative Study

Lumbar Vertebral Body Tethering

Video-assisted anterior thoracoscopic spinal fusion versus posterior spinal fusion: a comparative study utilizing the SRS-22 outcome instrument

466 Primary Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, With and Without Posterior Instrumentation: A 1377 Patient Cohort From a Multicenter Spine Registry

Health‐related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Outcomes of Selective/Nonselective Thoracic Fusion for Lenke 1C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) Patients with a Minimum 4‐year Follow‐up

P265. Is standalone ALIF a safe and effective treatment for low grade Isthmic spondylolisthesis?

1073 Prone Transpsoas (PTP)-LLIF Approach Versus Standard LLIF in Patients Undergoing Surgical Revision Following Adult Spinal Deformity Correction Surgery

Percutaneous short-segment pedicle screw placement without fusion in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: is it effective?: comparative study with open short-segment pedicle screw fixation with posterolateral fusion