External validation of and improvement upon a model for the prediction of placenta accreta spectrum severity using prospectively collected multicenter ultrasound data

Magdalena Kolak,Stephen Gerry,Hubert Huras,Ammar Al Naimi,Karin A. Fox,Thorsten Braun,Vedran Stefanovic,Heleen van Beekhuizen,Olivier Morel,Alexander Paping,Charline Bertholdt,Pavel Calda,Zdenek Lastuvka,Andrzej Jaworowski,Egle Savukyne,Sally Collins,IS‐PAS group
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14941
2024-08-23
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Abstract:This study evaluated the Sargent risk stratification algorithm for predicting placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) severity across multiple centers using the IS‐PAS database. The algorithm's ability to differentiate between abnormally adherent (FIGO grade 1) and invasive placenta (FIGO grades 2 and 3) was assessed, and a new model was developed based on this multicenter data. Analysis of 315 suspected PAS cases revealed that the Sargent model had moderate predictive accuracy in a multicenter context (C‐index 0.68), lower than in a single‐center setting (C‐index 0.90). The new model achieved a C‐index of 0.74. The study highlights challenges in creating universally applicable PAS models, suggesting the need for updated ultrasound descriptors and new models incorporating data from diverse clinical environments. Introduction This study aimed to validate the Sargent risk stratification algorithm for the prediction of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) severity using data collected from multiple centers and using the multicenter data to improve the model. Material and Methods We conducted a multicenter analysis using data collected for the IS‐PAS database. The Sargent model's effectiveness in distinguishing between abnormally adherent placenta (FIGO grade 1) and abnormally invasive placenta (FIGO grades 2 and 3) was evaluated. A new model was developed using multicenter data from the IS‐PAS database. Results The database included 315 cases of suspected PAS, of which 226 had fully documented standardized ultrasound signs. The final diagnosis was normal placentation in 5, abnormally adherent placenta/FIGO grade 1 in 43, and abnormally invasive placenta/FIGO grades 2 and 3 in 178. The external validation of the Sargent model revealed moderate predictive accuracy in a multicenter setting (C‐index 0.68), compared to its higher accuracy in a single‐center context (C‐index 0.90). The newly developed model achieved a C‐index of 0.74. Conclusions The study underscores the difficulty in developing universally applicable PAS prediction models. While models like that of Sargent et al. show promise, their reproducibility varies across settings, likely due to the interpretation of the ultrasound signs. The findings support the need for updating the current ultrasound descriptors and for the development of any new predictive models to use data collected by different operators in multiple clinical settings.
obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?