Abstract:Abstract Objective . Recently, transfer learning (TL) and deep learning (DL) have been introduced to solve intra- and inter-subject variability problems in brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). However, current TL and DL algorithms are usually validated within a single dataset, assuming that data of the test subjects are acquired under the same condition as that of training (source) subjects. This assumption is generally violated in practice because of different acquisition systems and experimental settings across studies and datasets. Thus, the generalization ability of these algorithms needs further validations in a cross-dataset scenario, which is closer to the actual situation. This study compared the transfer performance of pre-trained deep-learning models with different preprocessing strategies in a cross-dataset scenario. Approach . This study used four publicly available motor imagery datasets, each was successively selected as a source dataset, and the others were used as target datasets. EEGNet and ShallowConvNet with four preprocessing strategies, namely channel normalization, trial normalization, Euclidean alignment, and Riemannian alignment, were trained with the source dataset. The transfer performance of pre-trained models was validated on the target datasets. This study also used adaptive batch normalization (AdaBN) for reducing interval covariate shift across datasets. This study compared the transfer performance of using the four preprocessing strategies and that of a baseline approach based on manifold embedded knowledge transfer (MEKT). This study also explored the possibility and performance of fusing MEKT and EEGNet. Main results . The results show that DL models with alignment strategies had significantly better transfer performance than the other two preprocessing strategies. As an unsupervised domain adaptation method, AdaBN could also significantly improve the transfer performance of DL models. The transfer performance of DL models that combined AdaBN and alignment strategies significantly outperformed MEKT. Moreover, the generalizability of EEGNet models that combined AdaBN and alignment strategies could be further improved via the domain adaptation step in MEKT, achieving the best generalization ability among multiple datasets (BNCI2014001: 0.788, PhysionetMI: 0.679, Weibo2014: 0.753, Cho2017: 0.650). Significance . The combination of alignment strategies and AdaBN could easily improve the generalizability of DL models without fine-tuning. This study may provide new insights into the design of transfer neural networks for BCIs by separating source and target batch normalization layers in the domain adaptation process.

A cross-dataset adaptive domain selection transfer learning framework for motor imagery-based brain-computer interfaces

A novel dual-step transfer framework based on domain selection and feature alignment for motor imagery decoding

TFTL: A Task-Free Transfer Learning Strategy for EEG-based Cross-Subject & Cross-Dataset Motor Imagery BCI

Multi-source deep domain adaptation ensemble framework for cross-dataset motor imagery EEG transfer learning

Classification of motor imagery electroencephalogram signals by using adaptive cross-subject transfer learning

Multi-layer transfer learning algorithm based on improved common spatial pattern for brain-computer interfaces

Transfer Learning with Optimal Transportation and Frequency Mixup for EEG-Based Motor Imagery Recognition.

Transfer learning with data alignment and optimal transport for EEG based motor imagery classification

Domain Adaptive Algorithm Based on Multi-Manifold Embedded Distributed Alignment for Brain-Computer Interfaces

Cross-subject Trials Reweighting for Enhancing Motor Imagery-based Brain-Computer Interface

Joint multi-feature extraction and transfer learning in motor imagery brain computer interface

Three-stage transfer learning for motor imagery EEG recognition

Cross-dataset transfer learning for Motor Imagery signal classification via multi-task learning and pre-training

Adaptive transfer learning for EEG motor imagery classification with deep Convolutional Neural Network

Transfer Learning: Rotation Alignment with Riemannian Mean for Brain-Computer Interfaces and Wheelchair Control

Sub-band target alignment common spatial pattern in brain-computer interface

Transfer Learning for Motor Imagery Based Brain–computer Interfaces: A Tutorial

Cross-Subject Motor Imagery Decoding by Transfer Learning of Tactile ERD

Classification of Motor Imagery Using Multisource Joint Transfer Learning

An Adaptive Cross-Class Transfer Learning Framework with Two-Level Alignment

Enhancing transfer performance across datasets for brain-computer interfaces using a combination of alignment strategies and adaptive batch normalization