A Greenhouse Gas Budget for Mexico During 2000–2019
Guillermo Murray‐Tortarolo,Kevin Perea,Alma Mendoza‐Ponce,Amparo Martínez‐Arroyo,Fabiola Murguía‐Flores,Víctor J. Jaramillo,Montserrat Serrano‐Medrano,Miguel García‐García,Rodrigo Vargas,Abhishek Chatterjee,Anna Michalak,Zhen Zhang,Jonathan A. Wang,Benjamin Poulter
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2023jg007667
2024-01-03
Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
Abstract:Abstract Application of the best available science to improve quantification of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at regional and national scales is key to climate action. Here, we present a two‐decade (2000–2019) GHG (CO 2 , CH 4 , and N 2 O) budget for Mexico derived from multiple products. Data from the National GHG Inventory, global observations, and the scientific literature were compared to identify knowledge gaps on GHG flux dynamics and discrepancies among estimates. Total mean annual GHG emissions were estimated at 695–910 TgCO 2‐eq year −1 over these two decades, with 70% of the emissions attributable to CO 2 , 23% to CH 4 , and 5% to N 2 O (2% to other gases). When divided by sectors, we found agreement across emission estimates from various sources for fossil fuels, cattle, agriculture, and waste for all GHGs. However, considerable discrepancies were identified in the fluxes from terrestrial ecosystems. The disagreement was particularly large for the land CO 2 sink, where net biome production estimations from the national inventory were double those from any other observational product. Extensive knowledge gaps exist, mainly related to aquatic systems (e.g., outgassing in rivers) and the lateral fluxes (e.g., wood trade). In addition, limited information is available on CH 4 emissions from wetlands and soil CH 4 consumption. We expect these results to guide future research to reduce estimation uncertainties and fill the information gaps across Mexico.
environmental sciences,geosciences, multidisciplinary