Abstract:There is a growing interest to use plasmonic nanostructures for many applications including clean energy (e.g., solar cells), biological and chemical sensing. The optical behavior of metals is completely different from that observed at low frequencies. While at RF, metal behaves like a perfect electric conductor (with a negligible surface impedance) which is modeled by a surface electric current, at optical frequencies, the penetration of the waves cannot be ignored. Capturing this effect requires volumetric discretization of the structure. A plasmonic material has a complex permittivity with a negative real and positive imaginary parts (assuming e <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">‒iwt</sup> time convention). This results in a penetration depth of 1/k <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0</inf> n <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">i</inf> , where k <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0</inf> is the wavevector of the background material and n <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">i</inf> is the imaginary part of the refractive index of the plasmonic object. In optical wavelengths where the wavevector is very large, penetration depth becomes very small. Consequently, to model and consider the evanescent waves inside the plasmonic structures, a numerical method with a very fine meshing strategy near the plasmon-dielectric interface is required. Existing modeling numerical methods can be classified into differential equation methods (e.g., Finite Element Method (FEM) and Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD)) and integral equation (IE) methods (e.g., method of moments or MoM). In differential equation methods, the whole space should be discretized which will result in a large number of unknowns. In contrast, the integral equation methods only discretize the desired objects. Hence, if there is a large white space between objects, integral equation methods are preferred over differential equation methods. However, as soon as the size of the problem increases, and consequently the number of unknowns rises, traditional IE methods such as MoM will consume a huge memory and calculation time increases drastically. Also, these methods have serious problem dealing with multiscale multiphysics problems. Equivalence principle algorithm (EPA), as an efficient domain decomposition method, invokes equivalence principle to decompose the solution domain into subdomains and then solve each of them independently. Later, it stitches them together to calculate the solution for the original problem. The entire procedure can be accelerated by application of fast techniques such as the multilevel fast multipole algorithm (MLFMA). It provides a level of parallelization and also alleviates the need to build and save large matrices. Therefore, EPA (relatively) needs lesser amount of memory and it provides more robust solution for multiscale multiphysics problems. Although EPA has been used for several applications, but its application for modeling and analyzing nanoplasmonic structures has not been reported before and it will be presented in here.

Machine learning-based classification for predicting the power flow of surface plasmon polaritons in nanoplasmonic coupler

Finite-Element-Based Generalized Impedance Boundary Condition for Modeling Plasmonic Nanostructures

Multiphysics modeling of plasmonic nanodevices

Insights into the Machine Learning Predictions of the Optical Response of Plasmon@Semiconductor Core-Shell Nanocylinders

Integrated System-Level Electronic Design Automation (EDA) for Designing Plasmonic Nanocircuits

Plasmonics Nanosensor

Plasmonic Nanoparticle Simulations And Inverse Design Using Machine Learning

Machine learning for nanoplasmonics

An Efficient Numerical Method To Analyze Nanoplasmonic Structures

Instantaneous Property Prediction and Inverse Design of Plasmonic Nanostructures Using Machine Learning: Current Applications and Future Directions

Optimizing and Predicting Performance of Dual-Side Polished SPR Photonic Crystal Fiber using MLR and ANN Models

Artificial Neural Network Modelling for Optimizing the Optical Parameters of Plasmonic Paired Nanostructures

Time-domain Simulation for Plasmonic Devices

Machine learning classification for field distributions of photonic modes

Nanoplasmonic Sensors with Various Photonic Coupling Effects for Detecting Different Targets

Multilayer Plasmonic Nanostructures for Improved Sensing Activities Using a FEM and Neurocomputing-Based Approach

Machine Learning Models Capture Plasmon Dynamics in Ag Nanoparticles

Design of high-performance plasmonic nanosensors by particle swarm optimization algorithm combined with machine learning

A comprehensive deep learning method for empirical spectral prediction and its quantitative validation of nano-structured dimers

Physics-Driven Machine-Learning Approach Incorporating Temporal Coupled Mode Theory for Intelligent Design of Metasurfaces

AI Algorithm for Mode Classification of PCF SPR Sensor Design