Abstract:As rapid advances in Artificial Intelligence and the rise of some of history's most potent corporations meet the diminished neoliberal state, people are increasingly subject to power exercised by means of automated systems. Machine learning and related computational technologies now underpin vital government services. They connect consumers and producers in new algorithmic markets. They determine how we find out about everything from how to vote to where to get vaccinated, and whose speech is amplified, reduced, or restricted. And a new wave of products based on Large Language Models (LLMs) will further transform our economic and political lives. Automatic Authorities are automated computational systems used to exercise power over us by determining what we may know, what we may have, and what our options will be. In response to their rise, scholars working on the societal impacts of AI and related technologies have advocated shifting attention from how to make AI systems beneficial or fair towards a critical analysis of these new power relations. But power is everywhere, and is not necessarily bad. On what basis should we object to new or intensified power relations, and what can be done to justify them? This paper introduces the philosophical materials with which to formulate these questions, and offers preliminary answers. It starts by pinning down the concept of power, focusing on the ability that some agents have to shape others' lives. It then explores how AI enables and intensifies the exercise of power so understood, and sketches three problems with power and three ways to solve those problems. It emphasises, in particular, that justifying power requires more than satisfying substantive justificatory criteria; standards of proper authority and procedural legitimacy must also be met. We need to know not only what power may be used for, but how it may be used, and by whom.

The democratic offset: Contestation, deliberation, and participation regarding military applications of AI

Applying AI on the Battlefield: The Ethical Debates

Responsible use of AI in military systems: prospects and challenges

Autonomous drone swarms and the contested imaginaries of artificial intelligence

Toward Democracy Levels for AI

War Elephants: Rethinking Combat AI and Human Oversight

Commercial AI, Conflict, and Moral Responsibility: A theoretical analysis and practical approach to the moral responsibilities associated with dual-use AI technology

Artificial Intelligence and Democracy: A Conceptual Framework

Encoding the Enemy: The Politics Within and Around Ethical Algorithmic War

A Technological Perspective on Misuse of Available AI

Lethal autonomous robotics: Rethinking the dehumanization of warfare

AI-Powered Autonomous Weapons Risk Geopolitical Instability and Threaten AI Research

Public Constitutional AI

Jérôme Duberry, Artificial Intelligence and Democracy: Risks and Promises of AI-Mediated Citizen–Government Relations (Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2022)

From AI Ethics Principles to Practices: A Teleological Methodology to Apply AI Ethics Principles in The Defence Domain

An Ethic of Military Uses of Artificial Intelligence: Sustaining Virtue, Granting Autonomy, and Calibrating Risk

Democratising AI: Multiple Meanings, Goals, and Methods

Ethics of AI and Cybersecurity When Sovereignty is at Stake

Good AI for the Present of Humanity Democratizing AI Governance

Automatic Authorities: Power and AI

Australia's Approach to AI Governance in Security and Defence