Abstract:Prior research, primarily based on laboratory experiments, suggests that females might be more averse to competition than are males; females might, instead, be more inclined toward collaboration. Were these findings to generalize to working-age men and women across the workforce, there could be profound implications for organizational design and personnel management. We report on a field experiment in which 97,678 adults from a wide range of fields of training and career stages were invited to join a product development platform. Individuals were randomly assigned to treatments framing the opportunity as either involving competitive or collaborative interactions with other participants. Among those outside of science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields, we find differences in the willingness of men and women to participate under competition. Thus, patterns in non-STEM fields conform to the usual claims of gender differences. However, among those in STEM fields, we find no statistical gender differences. Results hold under a series of alternative specifications, controls, and stratified analyses of 17 narrowly defined STEM subfields. The results are also consistent with sorting into fields on the basis of competitiveness, as suggested by prior research, as well as other explanations we discuss. Overall, heterogeneity in competitiveness among women and among men, particularly across fields, appears more striking here than population-wide gender differences. Funding: This work was supported by Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation [Grant G00005624]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1624 .

Do Financial Incentives Encourage Women to Apply for a Tech Job? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment

Monetary Incentives and Innovation in Chinese SMEs

A Laboratory Experiment on Using Different Financial-Incentivization Schemes in Software-Engineering Experimentation

Heterogeneous Major Preferences for Extrinsic Incentives: The Effects of Wage Information on the Gender Gap in STEM Major Choice

Cash, non-cash, or mix? Gender matters! The impact of monetary, non-monetary, and mixed incentives on performance

Does pay disclosure in job offers remove gender differences in pay estimations? Evidence from an experiment with students and job seekers in the context of Austria

Does Artificial Intelligence Help or Hurt Gender Diversity? Evidence from Two Field Experiments on Recruitment in Tech

Strategic Behavior in Mobile Behavioral Intervention Platforms: Evidence from a Field Quasi-experiment on a Health Management App.

Gender Differences in Responses to Competitive Organization? A Field Experiment on Differences Between STEM and Non-STEM Fields from an Internet-of-Things Platform

Central Role Of The Ask Gap In Gender Pay Inequality

Does Information Disclosure Affect the Gender Gap in Bidding Behavior? Empirical Evidence from a Natural Experiment on a Large Online Labor Platform

An experimental test of whether financial incentives constitute undue inducement in decision-making

Financial Incentives Facilitate Stronger Neural Computation of Prosocial Decisions in Lower Empathic Adult Females

Entering a gender-neutral workplace? College students' expectations and the impact of information provision

The gender equity gap: A multistudy investigation of within-job inequality in equity-based awards.

Does Female Labor Scarcity Encourage Innovation?: Evidence from China's Gender Imbalance

What prevents Finnish women from applying to software engineering roles? A preliminary analysis of survey data

A Survey Selection Correction using Nonrandom Followup with an Application to the Gender Entrepreneurship Gap

On Her Own Account: How Strengthening Women's Financial Control Impacts Labor Supply and Gender Norms

Gender Discrimination in Hiring: Evidence from a Cross-National Harmonized Field Experiment

Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students