Abstract:From a global perspective,although the protection of freedom of expression will still be a problem in many countries,the new challenge of freedom of expression in the age of Internet is that people with ability and freedom to communicate freely tend to communicate only with people they agree with.This kind of ineffective communication leads to not only some negative consequences as "debates and communication cannot help people get close to the truth," but also to some serious negative ramifications as political division and social contradiction.In 2004,Ronald Dworkin delivered his concern in his writings on political division in American democracy.He also put forward his theoretical solution —"return to the common background." However,Dworkin's solution is more like an ideal one lack of practical strategy and workable operation.This article proposes a principle of "New Public Forum" and expects to solve the problem on a systematic,strategic and operational level.The principle of traditional public forum considers its main goal as solving the dilemma between the valuable role of mass media and the right of individuals to express freely and effectively.Today we have to deal with another dilemma because whereas the internet improves people's capability of sending and receiving information and expressing their opinions,the effectiveness of communication itself is still being threatened.Cyberkans,a phenomenon of worldwide network Balkanization,is the linchpin in this dilemma.Cyberkans results from complex factors such as political and legal policies,business strategies of Internet product manufacturers and a more crucial one that ordinary people as consumers tend to choose the internet product to help them filter for favorable information and opinions.In the Internet era,people not only rely on information filtration,but also prefer and actively choose filtering tools.They are fond of "personalized" products,which inevitably lead to information "cocoon" and "Daily Me." That is why people with different values,different preferences and different interests are easily separated and divided into different groups.Furthermore,opinions and beliefs in divided groups tend to become extreme in the process of "Group Polarization," which intensifies social contradictions and affects social stability because of the lack of effective debate and communication.Malfunction of the marketplace of opinions,group polarization and tagging tendency all manifest certain kind of ineffective communication resulting from Cyberkans. There are at least two solutions for these problems.The first one is to remove all separation institutes and integrate all information into one platform.This proposal fundamentally denies the network users' choices and overthrows market mechanism in the Network Economy,that's why it can only be applied to some web sites of government and other public service departments.The second solution is to establish a new kind of "Public Forum" for effective communication meanwhile keeping commodity market of internet working by itself.This new Public Forum Doctrine includes the test of extensity,compatibility and,the most important,efficiency.Extensity Test requires the forum to reach as many opinion groups as possible.Compatibility Test requires the forum to contain as many different opinions as possible.Efficiency Test requires political debaters to follow certain kind of regulations to make sure debates are reasonable and yield reasonable results.Considering the actual situation in China,the traditional mainstream media has the responsibility and capability to become the platform of the new public forum.

Speech behavior of the moderator in structuring the media dialogue: Models of topic management in the aspect of idiostyle (on the material of the video blog)

Cyberkans and Ineffectvie Communication:A New Public Forum Doctrine in the Internet Era

WHoW: A Cross-domain Approach for Analysing Conversation Moderation

The impact of verbal behavior on audience engagement in Chinese talk shows: Based on a novel mediation model

Persuasion or Insulting? Unpacking Discursive Strategies of Gender Debate in Everyday Feminism in China

Can Language Model Moderators Improve the Health of Online Discourse?

Engaging in Dialogues: The Impact of Comment Valence and Influencer-Viewer Interaction on the Effectiveness of YouTube Influencer Marketing

Managing Impressions Online: Microblogs and the State Media'S Adaptation of Online Logics in China

Multimodal Analysis of the Public Opinion Response Discourse on Government New Media

Speech Characteristics of Modern Blogger (Based on the Material of Bloggers-Embroiderers of Russian Video Hosting YouTube)

REPRESENTATION OF SPEECH STRATEGIES IN ENGLISH BUSINESS DISCOURSE

Moderation Challenges in Voice-based Online Communities on Discord

Which Social Media Facilitate Online Public Opinion in China?

Win-Win Cooperation:Model of the Interaction Between Social Organizations and Media

A Trade-off-centered Framework of Content Moderation

Visual Construction of Mainstream Media’s Fusion Columns under the Perspective of Multimodal Discourse Analysis

Brief Analysis of the Short Video Communication Strategy of "Xiaogang Story"

From Experts to the Public: Governing Multimodal Language Models in Politically Sensitive Video Analysis

Linguistic Characterization of Divisive Topics Online: Case Studies on Contentiousness in Abortion, Climate Change, and Gun Control

The danmu discourse of user engagement with cross-posted broadcast interviews in Chinese social media

Communication and Dialogue:Civil Society and Media Public Space