Abstract:Traditional methods of detecting concrete damage, such as manual inspection, are typically slow, labor‐intensive, and subjective. Integrating deep learning algorithms has automated this process, representing a significant advance in building damage inspection. Semantic segmentation, a technique within deep learning, is increasingly recognized for its capability to identify the location and shape of concrete damage accurately. Unlike basic deep learning approaches like classification and object detection, semantic segmentation not only recognizes damage but also delineates its boundaries, and has great potential in facilitating dimension measurement. However, multi‐level, high‐precision detection for various structural damage assessments remains an area requiring further research. This study created a database of reinforced concrete surfaces with pixel‐level, multi‐category semantic segmentation annotations for various levels of component damage, including cracks and spalling of concrete, exposure, buckling, fracture of reinforcing bars, etc. The performance of advanced deep learning segmentation algorithms, including U‐Net, DeepLab, K‐Net, and FastSCNN, was consequently trained and evaluated in detecting various types of concrete damage. All models show good accuracy of more than 98%, but lower F1 scores around 70%. U‐Net and K‐Net demonstrate relatively stable performance, indicating a certain degree of consistency and a high‐performance peak. In contrast, DeepLabv3's F1 score fluctuates significantly, suggesting the model may suffer from overfitting or other stability issues during training, resulting in a relatively low average performance. FastSCNN exhibits the highest potential, achieving the highest F1 score. In addition, this study also tested the performance of each model on new damage images and explored the impact of the dataset proportion ratio (training set vs. validation set), contributing to providing insights into each algorithm's suitability for various inspection scenarios. Finally, perspectives on current challenges and future directions in the field have also been given.

Automated corrosion detection using deep learning and computer vision

A real-time multi-defect automatic identification framework for concrete dams via improved YOLOv5 and knowledge distillation

Deep Learning-Based Damage Inspection for Concrete Structures

A Three-Step Computer Vision-Based Framework for Concrete Crack Detection and Dimensions Identification

Deep Learning-Based Steel Bridge Corrosion Segmentation and Condition Rating Using Mask RCNN and YOLOv8

Automatic detection of carbon steel corrosion degree based on image identification

Autonomous Image-Based Corrosion Detection in Steel Structures Using Deep Learning

Automated Surface Crack Detection in Historical Constructions with Various Materials Using Deep Learning-Based YOLO Network

Civil Infrastructure Damage and Corrosion Detection: An Application of Machine Learning

Bridge Damage Detection using a Single-Stage Detector and Field Inspection Images

Automated Corrosion Detection Using Crowd Sourced Training for Deep Learning

Mixed Reality-Based Concrete Crack Detection and Skeleton Extraction Using Deep Learning and Image Processing

A robust self-supervised approach for fine-grained crack detection in concrete structures

Autonomous surface crack identification of concrete structures based on the YOLOv7 algorithm

Automatic damage detection and segmentation using deep learning algorithms in reinforced concrete structure inspections

Corrosion Prediction in the Oil Industry Using Deep Learning Techniques

Concrete bridge surface damage detection using a single‐stage detector

Image-Based Corrosion Detection in Ancillary Structures

CorrDetector: A framework for structural corrosion detection from drone images using ensemble deep learning

Computer Vision Method for Automatic Detection of Microstructure Defects of Concrete

AI-assisted ultrasonic wave analysis for automated classification of steel corrosion-induced concrete damage