0224 Chronic change in sleep oscillation expression in older adults with insomnia with zolpidem or lemborexant and its effect on memory

Negin Sattari Barabadi,Abhishek Dave,Hamid Niknazar,Ivy Chen,Ariel Neikrug,Ruth Benca,Bryce Mander
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsad077.0224
IF: 6.313
2023-05-01
SLEEP
Abstract:Abstract Introduction Aging is accompanied by increased insomnia and memory decline. Enhancing GABAergic and antagonizing orexinergic function are both ways to treat insomnia, but how these mechanisms impact sleep oscillations, and consequently memory, among older adults with insomnia is unknown. Thus, chronic effects of zolpidem and lemborexant on quantitative sleep electroencephalography (EEG) and quality of memory among older adults with insomnia were evaluated. Methods 116 older adults (71.01±4.81y, 78.67% female) with insomnia (Insomnia Severity Index 18.73±3.13) completed a phase 3 study (E2006-G000-304; NCT02783729) with placebo (n=29), zolpidem-extended-release (6.25mg,n=26;ZOL), and lemborexant (5mg,n=29[LEM5]; 10mg,n=32[LEM10]) using polysomnography before (at baseline) and 29-30 days after chronic treatment. Spectral analysis was performed on artifact-free EEG data during NREM sleep. Changes in relative power within canonical frequency bands (i.e., slow-oscillation[0.5-1Hz], delta[1-4.5Hz], theta[4.5-7.5Hz], alpha[7.5-11Hz], slow-sigma[11-13Hz], fast-sigma[13-16Hz], beta[16-28Hz] and gamma[28-35Hz]) from baseline were compared between groups at averaged frontal electrodes at each visit. Working (WM) and episodic memory (EM) were measured at waketime using ANOVA models and Pearson correlations. Results A significant main effect of intervention on frequency bands delta (p=0.02), slow-sigma (p<.001), and fast-sigma (p<.001) was found, with greater chronic suppression in power for ZOL compared to PBO for delta (p=0.002). Compared to PBO, ZOL showed greater increase in power for slow-sigma (p<.001), fast-sigma (p<.001) and beta (p=.03), and was also associated with greater increases in power compared to LEM5 for slow-sigma (p<.001) and fast-sigma (p=.006), and compared to LEM10 for alpha (p=.04), slow-sigma (p< 0.00), and fast-sigma (p<.001). LEM5 showed greater beta (p=.05) than PBO. WM was significantly higher (better) for LEM5 compared to PBO (p=0.04), while EM was higher for PBO compared to ZOL (p=0.01). Increase in beta with ZOL was related to decreased change-from-baseline-WM (r=-0.43, p=.03); increases in theta and alpha with LEM5 were related to decreased change-from-baseline-EM [r=-0.38, p=0.04; r=-0.39, p=0.03]; and increase in delta with LEM10 was related to increased change-from-baseline-EM (r=0.43, p=0.02). Conclusion In older adults with insomnia disorder, chronic treatment with lemborexant and zolpidem had distinct effects on sleep oscillation expression and between power and memory. Functional consequences of these differential effects on sleep-oscillation expression and memory in insomnia patients should be further considered. Support (if any) Eisai
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?