Abstract:This study optimizes multidimensional variables in extrusion printing. The bio‐ink development process accelerates material and process selection, enhances molding resolution, and reduces costs related to scaffold manufacturing. The research focuses on the mechanical properties and tissue printing after cell addition, demonstrating improved fidelity and stability in printed nose tissue. These findings validate the feasibility and potential of the process in tissue engineering. Extrusion‐based 3D printing technology is currently demonstrating considerable potential in the field of tissue engineering scaffolds, enabling the construction of in vitro models with complex structures and functions using a wide range of biomaterials and cells at a low cost. In recent years, researchers have spent considerable effort developing novel bio‐inks and employing a greater variety of cell sources to enhance biological compatibility and functionality. However, the majority of current bio‐ink materials are unprintable due to their low viscosity and long curing time, as well as insufficient shape fidelity before the secondary cross‐linking process. The study aims to bridge this gap by optimizing the material ratios and predicting the printing process before work. This article presents new strategies for the design, fabrication, and analysis of a new composite bio‐ink material. The optimal ink ratios are verified by a design of experiments (DOE) experimental design and evaluation metrics for printing printability (Pr) values. A machine learning model is used to predict the ink printing area and determine the printing process parameters. The influence mechanism of ink materials with different concentrations of poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) ratios on printed fibers is investigated. Finally, the optimal results are used as an example to demonstrate the printability of multilayer stents. Thus, the design approach allows for the rapid and cost‐effective exploration of novel ink ratios, while also providing higher fidelity and more accurate process metrics for the fabrication of tissue structures with multidimensional variables.

Strategies for improving the 3D printability of decellularized extracellular matrix bioink

Three-Dimensional Bioprinting of Decellularized Extracellular Matrix-Based Bioinks for Tissue Engineering

Recent Advances in Decellularized Extracellular Matrix-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting in Tissue Engineering

Recent Advances in Decellularized Matrix-Derived Materials for Bioink and 3D Bioprinting

Designing Decellularized Extracellular Matrix‐Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting

Three-dimensional bioprinting with decellularized extracellular matrix-based bioinks in translational regenerative medicine

Decellularized extracellular matrix: A step towards the next generation source for bioink manufacturing.

Rise of tissue- and species-specific 3D bioprinting based on decellularized extracellular matrix-derived bioinks and bioresins

Decellularized extracellular matrix for three-dimensional bioprinted in vitro disease modeling

An Overview of Extracellular Matrix-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting

3D bioprinting of mechanically tuned bioinks derived from cardiac decellularized extracellular matrix

3D Bioprinting: A Novel Avenue for Manufacturing Tissues and Organs

Bioprinting Tissue Analogues with Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Bioink for Regeneration and Tissue Models of Cartilage and Intervertebral Discs

Fabrication of Liver Microtissue with Liver Decellularized Extracellular Matrix (decm) Bioink by Digital Light Processing (DLP) Bioprinting

The impact of mechanical tuning on the printability of decellularized amniotic membrane bioinks for cell-laden bioprinting of soft tissue constructs

New Strategies for High Efficiency and Precision Bioprinting by DOE Technology and Machine Learning

3D Bioprinting of Multi-Material Decellularized Liver Matrix Hydrogel at Physiological Temperatures

Emerging Frontiers in 3D Bioprinting: Harnessing Decellularized Matrix Bioink for Advancements in Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering

Decellularization and Their Significance for Tissue Regeneration in the Era of 3D Bioprinting

Extracellular‐Matrix‐Reinforced Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting Human Tissue

Engineering Bio-Inks for 3D Bioprinting Cell Mechanical Microenvironment