0228 Investigating Application of Phase Contrast MRI to Study CSF Movement in Aging and Sleep Deprivation

Taylor Pedersen,Jaqueline Flores,Elaine Peskind,Jeffrey Iliff,Swati Levendovzsky
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsad077.0228
IF: 6.313
2023-05-01
SLEEP
Abstract:Abstract Introduction The glymphatic system facilitates solute transport through the exchange of cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) and interstitial fluids using a brain-wide system of perivascular spaces. Such exchange is primarily active during sleep. Aging and sleep disruptions have been shown to decrease glymphatic clearance and increase risk of cognitive impairment. Here, we used phase contrast MRI (PC MRI) to measure CSF egress from the Aqueduct of Sylvius (AoS) as a marker of CSF circulation in the setting of sleep deprivation and aging. Methods Under approved IRB protocols six young adults (22±3 yo, 4F) underwent a night of full sleep and a night of sleep deprivation in a 3T Philips Ingenia Elition scanner with a 32-channel head coil. Additionally, six older adults (66±3 yo, 2F) were scanned using identical MRI protocol but only after full sleep. The PC MRI was a single slice acquisitions with 14 samples within a cardiac cycle. The slice was perpendicular to the AoS and care was taken to avoid any phase wrapping. All individuals also completed the General Practitioner’s assessment of cognition (GPCOG) in the morning prior to their scan. CSF velocity in cm/s was calculated from the phase data. Heart rate (HR) was recorded during the scan using a pulse-oximeter. Results CSF velocity was numerically lower after sleep deprivation (2.6±2.1 cm/s) than after a night of full sleep (3.1±2.0 cm/s) in young adults, but the difference was not significant. CSF velocity in the older adults was lower (2.0□0.5 cm/s, marginally significant at p = 0.10) than in young adults. HR in older adults (59±6) was significantly lower than the young adults under both conditions (full sleep: 68±4, sleep deprivation: (66±11) and, across all participants, HR was weakly correlated (r=-0.35) with CSF velocity. GPCOG was not significantly different across conditions or groups. Conclusion Although only marginally significant, CSF velocity in the AoS, measured by PC MRI is sensitive to HR variations and aging but not to sleep. Continued investigation with a larger sample size is underway to understand if these preliminary observations hold and if CSF velocity in the AoS is associated with glymphatic transport. Support (if any)
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?