Abstract:Objectives: The nature of communication between patient and practitioner influences patient outcomes. Specifically, the history-taking phase of a consultation plays a role in the development of a relationship and in the success of subsequent shared decision making. There is limited research investigating patient-centered communication in audiology, and this study may be the first to investigate verbal communication in an adult audiologic rehabilitation context. This research aimed, first, to describe the nature of verbal communication involving audiologists, patients, and companions in the history-taking phase of initial audiology consultations and, second, to determine factors associated with communication dynamics. Design: Sixty-three initial audiology consultations involving patients over the age of 55, their companions when present, and audiologists were audio-video recorded. Consultations were coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System and divided into three consultation phases: history, examination, and counseling. This study analyzed only the history-taking phase in terms of opening structure, communication profiles of each speaker, and communication dynamics. Associations between communication dynamics (verbal dominance, content balance, and communication control) and 11 variables were evaluated using Linear Mixed Model methods. Results: The mean length of the history-taking phase was 8.8 min (range 1.7 to 22.6). A companion was present in 27% of consultations. Results were grouped into three areas of communication: opening structure, information exchange, and relationship building. Examination of the history opening structure revealed audiologists' tendency to control the agenda by initiating consultations with a closed-ended question 62% of the time, followed by interruption of patient talk after 21.3 sec, on average. The aforementioned behaviors were associated with increased verbal dominance throughout the history and increased control over the content of questions. For the remainder of the history, audiologists asked 97% of the questions and did so primarily in closed-ended form. This resulted in the audiologist talking as much as the patient and much more than the companions when they were present. Questions asked by the audiologist were balanced in topic: biomedical and psychosocial/lifestyle; however, few emotionally focused utterances were observed from any speaker (less than 5% of utter ances). Conclusions: Analysis of verbal communication involving audiologists, patients, and companions in the history-taking phase in 63 initial audiology consultations revealed a communicative exchange that was audiologist-controlled and structured, but covered both medical and lifestyle content. Audiologists often attempted to create a relationship with their patients; however, little emotional relationship building occurred, which may have implications later in the consultation when management decisions are being made. These results are not in line with patient-centered communication principles. Further research and changes to clinical practice are warranted to transform patient-centered communication from an ideal to a reality.

Comparing Companion Involvement in Clinical Telephone and Face-To-Face Consultations About Seizures

Face-to-face and telephone appointments in the seizure clinic: A comparative analysis based on recorded interactions

Exploring patients' views on telephone consultations in the seizure clinic: A qualitative interview study

Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic for improving outpatient neuropalliative care: A qualitative study of patient and caregiver perspectives

Telephone consulting for 'Personalised Care and Support Planning' with people with long-term conditions: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' experiences during COVID-19 restrictions and beyond

A Quantitative and Qualitative Study on Patient and Physician Perceptions of Nephrology Telephone Consultation During COVID-19

Hello, can you hear me? Orthopaedic clinic telephone consultations in the COVID-19 era- a patient and clinician perspective

Communication Challenges Experienced by Clinicians and Patients During Teleconsultation. Scoping Review.

Communication and Teamwork During Telemedicine-Enabled Stroke Care in an Ambulance

The Tell on Telehealth

Family caregivers improve the diagnostic accuracy of disorders of consciousness: from remote to near-bed auditory stimulation

Nonverbal behavior in telehealth visits: A narrative review

Patient Selection Is the Key for Successful Video Appointments: Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic

"You want them to be partners in therapy, but that's tricky when they're not there": A qualitative study exploring caregiver involvement across the continuum of care during the early COVID pandemic

Tell me who you're coming with, I'll tell you what you have!

Clinicians' User Experience of Telemedicine in Neurosurgery During COVID-19

Communication patterns in audiologic rehabilitation history-taking: audiologists, patients, and their companions

An accelerated shift in the use of remote systems in epilepsy due to the COVID-19 pandemic

Companion responses to diagnosis in Chinese outpatient clinical interaction

[«Digital Postcovid Syndrome» - possibilities and limits in digital communication with neurological patients]

Editorial: To zoom or not to zoom – that is the question