Abstract:In Grammatical Error Correction (GEC), it is crucial to ensure the user's comprehension of a reason for correction. Existing studies present tokens, examples, and hints as to the basis for correction but do not directly explain the reasons for corrections. Although methods that use Large Language Models (LLMs) to provide direct explanations in natural language have been proposed for various tasks, no such method exists for GEC. Generating explanations for GEC corrections involves aligning input and output tokens, identifying correction points, and presenting corresponding explanations consistently. However, it is not straightforward to specify a complex format to generate explanations, because explicit control of generation is difficult with prompts. This study introduces a method called controlled generation with Prompt Insertion (PI) so that LLMs can explain the reasons for corrections in natural language. In PI, LLMs first correct the input text, and then we automatically extract the correction points based on the rules. The extracted correction points are sequentially inserted into the LLM's explanation output as prompts, guiding the LLMs to generate explanations for the correction points. We also create an Explainable GEC (XGEC) dataset of correction reasons by annotating NUCLE, CoNLL2013, and CoNLL2014. Although generations from GPT-3 and ChatGPT using original prompts miss some correction points, the generation control using PI can explicitly guide to describe explanations for all correction points, contributing to improved performance in generating correction reasons.

Enhancing Grammatical Error Correction Systems with Explanations

EXCGEC: A Benchmark of Edit-wise Explainable Chinese Grammatical Error Correction

Interpretability for Language Learners Using Example-Based Grammatical Error Correction

Controlled Generation with Prompt Insertion for Natural Language Explanations in Grammatical Error Correction

Evaluating Prompting Strategies for Grammatical Error Correction Based on Language Proficiency

FCGEC: Fine-Grained Corpus for Chinese Grammatical Error Correction

CLEME2.0: Towards More Interpretable Evaluation by Disentangling Edits for Grammatical Error Correction

LET: Leveraging Error Type Information for Grammatical Error Correction

Grammatical Error Correction: A Survey of the State of the Art

From Spelling to Grammar: A New Framework for Chinese Grammatical Error Correction

TransGEC: Improving Grammatical Error Correction with Translationese

Pillars of Grammatical Error Correction: Comprehensive Inspection Of Contemporary Approaches In The Era of Large Language Models

Evaluation of really good grammatical error correction

A Simple but Effective Classification Model for Grammatical Error Correction.

Efficient and Interpretable Grammatical Error Correction with Mixture of Experts

Neural Quality Estimation with Multiple Hypotheses for Grammatical Error Correction

Rethinking the Roles of Large Language Models in Chinese Grammatical Error Correction

Improving Grammatical Error Correction with Data Augmentation by Editing Latent Representation

Grammatical Error Correction for Code-Switched Sentences by Learners of English

Improving Grammatical Error Correction Models with Purpose-Built Adversarial Examples

SynGEC: Syntax-Enhanced Grammatical Error Correction with a Tailored GEC-Oriented Parser