Abstract:Estimating the probability of the binomial distribution is a basic problem, which appears in almost all introductory statistics courses and is performed frequently in various studies. In some cases, the parameter of interest is a difference between two probabilities, and the current work studies the construction of confidence intervals for this parameter when the sample size is small. Our goal is to find the shortest confidence intervals under the constraint of coverage probability being at least as large as a predetermined level. For the two-sample case, there is no known algorithm that achieves this goal, but different heuristics procedures have been suggested, and the present work aims at finding optimal confidence intervals. In the one-sample case, there is a known algorithm that finds optimal confidence intervals presented by Blyth and Still (J Am Stat Assoc 78(381):108–116, 1983). It is based on solving small and local optimization problems and then using an inversion step to find the global optimum solution. We show that this approach fails in the two-sample case and therefore, in order to find optimal confidence intervals, one needs to solve a global optimization problem, rather than small and local ones, which is computationally much harder. We present and discuss the suitable global optimization problem. Using the Gurobi package we find near-optimal solutions when the sample sizes are smaller than 15, and we compare these solutions to some existing methods, both approximate and exact. We find that the improvement in terms of lengths with respect to the best competitor varies between 1.5 and 5% for different parameters of the problem. Therefore, we recommend the use of the new confidence intervals when both sample sizes are smaller than 15. Tables of the confidence intervals are given in the Excel file in this link (https://technionmail-my.sharepoint.com/:f:/g/personal/ap_campus_technion_ac_il/El-213Kms51BhQxR8MmQJCYBDfIsvtrK9mQIey1sZnZWIQ?e=hxGunl).

A comparison of some confidence intervals for a binomial proportion based on a shrinkage estimator

Confidence Intervals for the Binomial Proportion: A Comparison of Four Methods

Cost-Efficient Fixed-Width Confidence Intervals for the Difference of Two Bernoulli Proportions

Modified Clopper-Pearson Confidence Interval for Binomial Proportion

Two-sided confidence interval of a binomial proportion: how to choose?

An optimal exact confidence interval for the difference of two independent binomial proportions

The cost of using exact confidence intervals for a binomial proportion

Optimal confidence interval for the difference between proportions

Generalised Clopper–Pearson confidence intervals for the binomial proportion

Comparing Confidence Intervals for a Binomial Proportion with the Interval Score

Binomial Confidence Intervals for Rare Events: Importance of Defining Margin of Error Relative to Magnitude of Proportion

Asymptotic infimum coverage probability for interval estimation of proportions

Estimation of Proportion of Success From a Stratified Population: A Comparative Study

On Finding the Upper Confidence Limit for a Binomial Proportion when Zero Successes are Observed

Hypothesis Test to Compare Two Paired Binomial Proportions: Assessment of 24 Methods

A Note on Confidence Intervals for a Binomial p: Andersson–Nerman vs. Wilson

Formulas, Algorithms and Examples for Binomial Distributed Data Confidence Interval Calculation: Excess Risk, Relative Risk and Odds Ratio

Confidence Intervals for the Probability of Superiority Effect Size Measure and the Area Under a Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve

Exact adaptive confidence intervals for small areas

Design and analysis of shortest two-sided confidence intervals for a probability under prior information

Estimating the reciprocal of a binomial proportion