Abstract:Whether and how people regulate their negative emotions matters a great deal. However, it is not yet clear why people regulate as they do. One promising idea is that people's beliefs shape their emotion regulation choices, and initial evidence indicates that individuals' dispositional beliefs about emotions are indeed associated with general patterns of emotion regulation. The present study extends prior work on emotion beliefs to better understand how occurrent (i.e., momentary) beliefs about helpfulness, controllability, and justification of specific emotions shape whether and how people regulate negative emotions in everyday life. Participants (N = 143; U.S. community college students recruited in 2022; 76% female; age = 18-60) completed a 7-day experience-sampling protocol in which they were pinged three times per day to describe their most recent negative experiences and answer questions about their emotions, occurrent beliefs about emotions, and emotion regulation. With respect to whether people regulate their emotions, results reveal that people regulate their emotions more when they perceive them to be less helpful. Exploratory analyses additionally show that people regulate negative emotions more when they perceive them to be more controllable and when emotional intensity is relatively high. In terms of how people regulate their emotions, people are more likely to use reappraisal when emotions are seen as more helpful, more controllable, and less justified; and more likely to use distraction when emotions are seen as less helpful and more justified. These findings contribute to a more fine-grained understanding of how beliefs shape emotion regulation in everyday life.respect to whether people regulate their emotions, results reveal that people regulate their emotions more when they perceive them to be less helpful. Exploratory analyses additionally show that people regulate negative emotions more when they perceive them to be more controllable and when emotional intensity is relatively high. In terms of how people regulate their emotions, people are more likely to use reappraisal when emotions are seen as more helpful, more controllable, and less justified; and more likely to use distraction when emotions are seen as less helpful and more justified. These findings contribute to a more fine-grained understanding of how beliefs shape emotion regulation (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Emotion malleability beliefs predict daily positive and negative affect in adolescents

Relation of emotion malleability beliefs to subjective well-being: A short-term longitudinal study.

Emotion malleability beliefs and event intensity and importance predict emotion regulation in daily life

Emotion malleability beliefs matter in emotion regulation: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis

Examining the association among adolescents' emotional clarity, emotion differentiation, and the regulation of negative and positive affect using a daily diary approach

Emotion beliefs and goal setting: Malleability of emotion predicts changes in goal orientation across a semester

The Association of Emotion Regulation Flexibility and Negative and Positive Affect in Daily Life

Reciprocal Effects Between Negative Affect and Emotion Regulation in Daily Life

Emotion regulation strategies in daily life: mindfulness, cognitive reappraisal and emotion suppression

Emotion-related Processes Between Parents and Adolescents: Evidence for Bidirectional Effects over Time.

Predicting the likelihood and amount of fading, fixed, flourishing, and flexible positive and negative affect of autobiographical memories

Negative affect instability predicts elevated depressive and generalized anxiety disorder symptoms even when negative affect intensity is controlled for: an ecological momentary assessment study

The Relationship Between Emotion Malleability Beliefs and Suicidal Ideation or Behaviors

Occurrent beliefs about emotions predict emotion regulation in everyday life.

Longitudinal Associations Between Emotion Regulation Strategies and Subjective Well-Being in Migrant and Non-Migrant Adolescents in Urban China.

Daily Affect and Self-Esteem in Early Adolescence: Correlates of Mean Levels and Within-Person Variability

Changes in affect longitudinally mediate associations between emotion regulation strategy use and disordered eating

Children's emotional reactivity and negative affect predict future ADHD symptom severity beyond initial ADHD symptom severity

Real-time assessment of positive and negative affective fluctuations and mood lability in a transdiagnostic sample of youth

The effects of emotion regulation strategies on positive and negative affect in early adolescents

Emotion dynamics in children and adolescents: A meta-analytic and descriptive review.