Curvature of gastrocnemius muscle fascicles as function of muscle–tendon complex length and contraction in humans

Jule Heieis,Jonas Böcker,Olfa D'Angelo,Uwe Mittag,Kirsten Albracht,Eckhard Schönau,Andreas Meyer,Thomas Voigtmann,Jörn Rittweger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15739
2023-06-04
Physiological Reports
Abstract:With this study we were able to describe fascicle curvature as detailed as it has not been done before. Strong correlations have been found between concave fascicle curvature towards the deep aponeurosis and the deep pennation angle and the inverse fascicle length. There has also been found evidence for intramuscular differences in fascicle curvature in a central‐peripheral pattern. It has been shown that muscle fascicle curvature increases with increasing contraction level and decreasing muscle–tendon complex length. The analyses were done with limited examination windows concerning contraction level, muscle–tendon complex length, and/or intramuscular position of ultrasound imaging. With this study we aimed to investigate the correlation between fascicle arching and contraction, muscle–tendon complex length and their associated architectural parameters in gastrocnemius muscles to develop hypotheses concerning the fundamental mechanism of fascicle curving. Twelve participants were tested in five different positions (90°/105°*, 90°/90°*, 135°/90°*, 170°/90°*, and 170°/75°*; *knee/ankle angle). They performed isometric contractions at four different contraction levels (5%, 25%, 50%, and 75% of maximum voluntary contraction) in each position. Panoramic ultrasound images of gastrocnemius muscles were collected at rest and during constant contraction. Aponeuroses and fascicles were tracked in all ultrasound images and the parameters fascicle curvature, muscle–tendon complex strain, contraction level, pennation angle, fascicle length, fascicle strain, intramuscular position, sex and age group were analyzed by linear mixed effect models. Mean fascicle curvature of the medial gastrocnemius increased with contraction level (+5 m−1 from 0% to 100%; p = 0.006). Muscle–tendon complex length had no significant impact on mean fascicle curvature. Mean pennation angle (2.2 m−1 per 10°; p
What problem does this paper attempt to address?