Learning What Works: A Mixed-Methods Study of American Self-identified Food Conservers

Gwendoline Balto,Shelly Palmer,Jade Hamann,Elizabeth Gutierrez,Yiyang Liu,Melissa Pflugh Prescott
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2023.12.003
IF: 2.822
2024-01-22
Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Abstract:Objective Identify psychosocial factors influencing food waste mitigation and explore motivations and strategies for successful conservation among self-identified food conservers. Methods Mixed-methods study consisting of an online survey estimating food waste production and psychosocial factors and a focus group to explore waste mitigation strategies and motivations. Results Sampled 27 self-identified conservers (female, aged 18–30 years, White/Asian). Mean household food waste was 6.6 cups/wk (range, 0.0–97.9 cups/wk; median 1.3 cups). Reported waste mitigation strategies include proactive mitigation and adaptive recovery measures in each phase of the food management continuum. Conservers reported various intrinsic and extrinsic motivations to reduce food waste and viewed barriers as manageable. Conclusions and Implications Food conservers act on high intentions to reduce waste by consistently employing both proactive waste mitigation and adaptive food recovery measures. Future research is needed to determine if these findings hold in larger, more diverse samples and link specific behaviors to waste volume.
nutrition & dietetics,education, scientific disciplines
What problem does this paper attempt to address?