Abstract:BackgroundRNA molecules play diverse functional and structural roles in cells. They function as messengers for transferring genetic information from DNA to proteins, as the primary genetic material in many viruses, as catalysts (ribozymes) important for protein synthesis and RNA processing, and as essential and ubiquitous regulators of gene expression in living organisms. Many of these functions depend on precisely orchestrated interactions between RNA molecules and specific proteins in cells. Understanding the molecular mechanisms by which proteins recognize and bind RNA is essential for comprehending the functional implications of these interactions, but the recognition ‘code’ that mediates interactions between proteins and RNA is not yet understood. Success in deciphering this code would dramatically impact the development of new therapeutic strategies for intervening in devastating diseases such as AIDS and cancer. Because of the high cost of experimental determination of protein-RNA interfaces, there is an increasing reliance on statistical machine learning methods for training predictors of RNA-binding residues in proteins. However, because of differences in the choice of datasets, performance measures, and data representations used, it has been difficult to obtain an accurate assessment of the current state of the art in protein-RNA interface prediction.ResultsWe provide a review of published approaches for predicting RNA-binding residues in proteins and a systematic comparison and critical assessment of protein-RNA interface residue predictors trained using these approaches on three carefully curated non-redundant datasets. We directly compare two widely used machine learning algorithms (Naïve Bayes (NB) and Support Vector Machine (SVM)) using three different data representations in which features are encoded using either sequence- or structure-based windows. Our results show that (i) Sequence-based classifiers that use a position-specific scoring matrix (PSSM)-based representation (PSSMSeq) outperform those that use an amino acid identity based representation (IDSeq) or a smoothed PSSM (SmoPSSMSeq); (ii) Structure-based classifiers that use smoothed PSSM representation (SmoPSSMStr) outperform those that use PSSM (PSSMStr) as well as sequence identity based representation (IDStr). PSSMSeq classifiers, when tested on an independent test set of 44 proteins, achieve performance that is comparable to that of three state-of-the-art structure-based predictors (including those that exploit geometric features) in terms of Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC), although the structure-based methods achieve substantially higher Specificity (albeit at the expense of Sensitivity) compared to sequence-based methods. We also find that the expected performance of the classifiers on a residue level can be markedly different from that on a protein level. Our experiments show that the classifiers trained on three different non-redundant protein-RNA interface datasets achieve comparable cross-validation performance. However, we find that the results are significantly affected by differences in the distance threshold used to define interface residues.ConclusionsOur results demonstrate that protein-RNA interface residue predictors that use a PSSM-based encoding of sequence windows outperform classifiers that use other encodings of sequence windows. While structure-based methods that exploit geometric features can yield significant increases in the Specificity of protein-RNA interface residue predictions, such increases are offset by decreases in Sensitivity. These results underscore the importance of comparing alternative methods using rigorous statistical procedures, multiple performance measures, and datasets that are constructed based on several alternative definitions of interface residues and redundancy cutoffs as well as including evaluations on independent test sets into the comparisons.

Efficient mapping of RNA‐binding residues in RNA‐binding proteins using local sequence features of binding site residues in protein‐RNA complexes

Identification of RNA-binding Sites in Proteins by Integrating Various Sequence Information.

Analysis and Prediction of RNA-binding Residues Using Sequence, Evolutionary Conservation, and Predicted Secondary Structure and Solvent Accessibility.

Structure-Based Prediction of Rna-Binding Domains and Rna-Binding Sites and Application to Structural Genomics Targets

RBPBind: Quantitative Prediction of Protein-RNA Interactions

Accurate prediction of RNA-binding protein residues with two discriminative structural descriptors

SPOT-Seq-RNA: Predicting Protein-Rna Complex Structure and RNA-binding Function by Fold Recognition and Binding Affinity Prediction.

Prediction of RNA binding proteins comes of age from low resolution to high resolution.

A Boosting Approach for Prediction of Protein-Rna Binding Residues.

RBRIdent: An algorithm for improved identification of RNA-binding residues in proteins from primary sequences.

Seq-RBPPred: Predicting RNA-Binding Proteins from Sequence.

Prediction of RNA-binding residues in proteins from primary sequence using an enriched random forest model with a novel hybrid feature.

RBPmap: a web server for mapping binding sites of RNA-binding proteins

A Novel Method for Predicting RNA-interacting Residues in Proteins Using a Combination of Feature-Based and Sequence Template-Based Methods

Prediction of Protein-Rna Binding Sites by a Random Forest Method with Combined Features

Protein-RNA interface residue prediction using machine learning: an assessment of the state of the art

Annotating the Protein-Rna Interaction Sites in Proteins Using Evolutionary Information and Protein Backbone Structure

PRBP: Prediction of RNA-Binding Proteins Using a Random Forest Algorithm Combined with an RNA-Binding Residue Predictor

Deep Neural Networks for Inferring Binding Sites of RNA-binding Proteins by Using Distributed Representations of RNA Primary Sequence and Secondary Structure.

A Deep Neural Network Approach Using Distributed Representations of RNA Sequence and Structure for Identifying Binding Site of RNA-binding Proteins

Refining the pool of RNA-binding domains advances the classification and prediction of RNA-binding proteins