Simultaneous Bilateral Retroperitoneoscopic Nephroureterectomy in Renal Recipients: a Single-Center Experience
Lulin Ma,Jianfei Ye,Wenhao Tang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20141377
2014-01-01
Abstract:Conventional simultaneous bilateral open nephroureterectomy combined with resection of bladder cuffs seems not optimal for bilateral upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) in renal transplant and dialysis patients with enormous invasion related to large morbidity, delayed gastrointestinal function, and late recovery.1 This study reports the largest series of minimally invasive procedures of simultaneous bilateral retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy (SBRNU) via a midline lower abdominal incision in renal recipients. METHODS Seventy-eight renal recipients underwent nephroureterectomy for clinically suspicious native upper urinary tract carcinomas among the 1 098 renal transplant recipients at our institution between April 2006 and November 2012. Twelve of them underwent SBRNU with specimens retrieved via a midline lower abdominal incision. No prisoners or organs from prisoners were used in the collection of data in this study. All the 12 patients with SBRNU were female. The mean age and the body mass index were (58±7) (46–69) years old and (21.6±3.2) (16.2–27.8) kg/m2. The mean time from renal transplantation to clinical diagnosis of UTUC was (59.3±30.1) (11–105) months. Ultrasonography of native urinary system and transplant kidney was performed as a routine scanning examination. Computerized tomography or magnetic resonance of the urinary system was required to locate the malignancies. Preoperative cystoscopy and retrograde pyelography were performed to find out any concomitant bladder tumors or filling defects in upper urinary tracts. Ureteropyeloscopy should be applied to visualize the tumors in questionable cases. Specific indications for SBRNU included the following: hematuria with bilateral hydronephrosis: 2; unilateral upper tract tumors with contralateral hydronephrosis: 3; evidence of bilateral UTUC: 2; multifocal tumors in unilateral upper tract: 1; unilateral upper tract tumors with bladder involved: 1; and bilateral hydronephrosis with failed ureteropyeloscopy: 3. Perioperative data and oncologic outcomes were recorded for analysis. In questionable cases, ureteropyeloscopy should be applied to visualize the tumor, and biopsy was performed if there was any suspicion. However, three of them failed to undergo biopsy because of the stricture of the ureters. So, many patients refused to undergo this procedure before nephroureterectomy. The whole procedure consisted of two retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomies, one transurethral resection of bilateral ureteral orifices with bladder cuffs and retrial of specimens via a midline lower abdominal incision. Our experienced technique of retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy has been described before.2 Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy was performed, respectively, with repositioning twice. Transurethral resection of bilateral ureteral orifices with bladder cuffs was done, and a midline lower abdominal incision was made to dissect the bilateral distal ureters and remove the specimens. Under general anesthesia, the patient was placed in lateral decubitus position. A 3-troca retroperitoneoscopy was established. After dissection of the Gerota's fascia, the renal artery was identified from dorsal middle part of the kidney between the Gerota's fascia and greater psoas muscle. Two plastic locking clips were placed at the proximal end of the renal artery and one plastic locking clip on the distal side. The renal artery was sheared by scissors with one clip on the distal side. The renal vein was controlled similarly with plastic locking clips. The ureter with periureteral tissue was laparoscopically dissected down to the level of iliac vessels and clipped by a metallic clip distally. Then, the kidney was pushed down to the pelvic cavity. An 18F suction drainage was placed in the renal fossa for observation of potential hemorrhage. The incisions were closed with running sutures. Retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy on the other side was performed similarly with the patient repositioned. Cystoscopy was introduced with the patient repositioned in the lithotomy position. Transurethral resection of bladder tumor was performed if there was any concomitant tumor. The bilateral ureteral orifices with 1-cm bladder cuffs around were circumferentially excised into the perivesical fat. The transplant ureter should be taken care of as it may be injured during excision. A Foley catheter was indwelled for 1 week. A 6–8 cm midline lower abdominal incision was made between the umbilicus and symphysis pubis with the patient in a supine position. The peritoneum was penetrated. The ureters were located at the cross over of the iliac vessels. The distal ureters were dissected into the intramural segments and extracted completely. The intact bilateral specimens with complete resection of the kidneys, perirenal tissues, ureters, and bladder cuffs were removed manually via the midline lower abdominal incision. The cystostomies were generally sutured and closed. A suction drainage was placed in the pelvic cavity for observation of potential leakage of urine. All of the patients who were confirmed with upper tract transitional cell carcinoma were routinely treated with routine bladder irrigation with pirarubicin or epirubicin postoperatively. RESULTS All of the 12 procedures were carried out successfully and consecutively. Perioperative data were shown in Table 1. Two of them were accompanied with transurethral resection of bladder tumors simultaneously. The mean operation time was (281.0±45.7) (225–360) minutes. The mean estimated blood loss was (177.5±118.6) (50–400) ml. The mean wound length was (7.1±1.0) (6–8) cm. Three of them were transfused with 800, 400, and 400 ml of red blood cells, respectively, because of the low level of preoperative hemoglobin. Seven patients required analgesics of meperidine with a mean dose of (54.2±49.8) (50–100) mg by intramuscular injection. One patient suffered from pulmonary infection and another retroperitoneal hematoma postoperatively, which were all cured by conservative treatments. No Grade II complications according to Clavien Classification that require re-operations or conversion were encountered in our series. The mean levels of preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine of the renal recipients were (1.2±0.8) (0.69–3.73) mg/dl and (1.0±0.3) (0.59–1.84) mg/dl, respectively. The mean postoperative hospital stay was (10.9±4.1) (7–22) days. No acute rejection or postoperative deterioration of graft function was found in these 12 patients. All of them resumed oral intake of immunosuppressants without changing the dosage on postoperative day 1. None of the ureteral margins was positive. With the mean follow-up of (55.0±26.0) (15–93) months, none of them was found with local recurrence or distant metastasis. Bladder tumors developed in two patients during follow-up. One patient with concomitant bladder tumor had bladder recurrences at 10 and 14 months later, respectively, and underwent partial cystectomies twice at the local hospital. One patient underwent partial cystectomy 27 months later due to bladder tumor.Table 1: Perioperative data of SBRNUDISCUSSION De novo malignancy was a well-documented complication threatening long-term survival of organ recipients. The incidence of de novo urothelial carcinoma after renal transplantation has been reported to be 1.89%-4.1%, with a predominantly high percentage of 31%-43.5% in de novo malignancies in renal recipients in China.3 High cumulative incidences of synchronous or metachronous bilateral UTUC were also noted to be 11.1%-36.7% in de novo malignancies after renal transplantation.4 Bilateral transperitoneal laparoscopic nephroureterectomy was associated with wide working space and familiar landmarks as well as limited exposure of target organs and risk of bowel injury due to the obscurity of surrounding intra-abdominal organs in comparison with retroperitoneal approach. Since we are more familiar with retroperitoneal approach, it was preferred as a routine procedure for nephrectomy, adrenalectomy, and so on at our institution. Then, the retroperitoneal approach was associated with better renal hilar control and less disturbance of intraperitoneal organs in our experience, which we can learn from the techniques of open surgeries. With sufficient experience of retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy at our institution, we preferred this retroperitoneal approach to avoid gastrointestinal complications, which would suspend the oral intake of immunosuppressants for transplant patients. A midline lower abdominal incision was designed to dissect the bilateral distal ureters and remove the specimens during SBRNU for select renal recipients, since high cumulative incidences of synchronous or metachronous bilateral UTUC were noted in de novo malignancies after renal transplantation in China.3,4 The midline lower abdominal incision was much like the way in bilateral hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, which may be related to advantages of adequate excision of the distal ureters, hemostatic closure of cystostomy, and costeffective manner without any staplers or other disposables. This midline lower abdominal incision could provide wide working space to manage bilateral distal ureters without any difficulties due to a transplanted kidney. However, the wound length in our procedure was shorter than the one in hand assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, which was 9.2 cm.5 The risk of tumor cell spillage with subsequent seeding and wound metastases was decreased by the suture of cystostomies and clipping the distal ureter in laparoscopy and manual removal of intact specimens with minimal disruption via this incision. Herein, the primary experience indicates that SBRNU and transurethral resection of bilateral bladder cuffs with manual removal of specimens via a midline lower abdominal incision is feasible and minimally invasive for bilateral upper tract urothelial malignancy in select renal recipients with satisfactory oncologic outcomes. However, the efficacy of this approach should be confirmed in large series of study and long-term follow-up.