Comparing niraparib versus platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with newly diagnosed homologous recombination–deficient stage III/IV ovarian cancer: study protocol for cohort C of the open-label, phase 2, randomized controlled multicenter OPAL trial

Jimmy Belotte,Brunella Felicetti,Amanda J. Baines,Ahmed YoussefAgha,Luis Rojas-Espaillat,Ana Godoy Ortiz,Diane Provencher,Raúl Márquez Vázquez,Lucia González Cortijo,Xing Zeng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08142-5
IF: 2.728
2024-05-06
Trials
Abstract:Maintenance therapy with niraparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, has been shown to extend progression-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer who responded to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, regardless of biomarker status. However, there are limited data on niraparib's efficacy and safety in the neoadjuvant setting. The objective of Cohort C of the OPAL trial (OPAL-C) is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of neoadjuvant niraparib treatment compared with neoadjuvant platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer with confirmed homologous recombination–deficient tumors.
medicine, research & experimental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?