Risk factors for contaminated blood cultures in the emergency department: a prospective cohort study

Koshi Ota,Yuriko Takeda,Daisuke Nishioka,Masahiro Oka,Emi Hamada,Kanna Ota,Yuriko Shibata,Kazuma Yamakawa,Akira Takasu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mran.2023.100264
IF: 1.641
2023-05-26
Microbial Risk Analysis
Abstract:Background : We aimed to determine risk factors associated with rates of contaminated blood cultures in the emergency department (ED). Methods : This single-center, cohort study of 1098 consecutive patients ≥ 20 years of age was performed in the ED of university hospital over a 26-month period. Results : We analyzed 2096 pairs of blood cultures. Potential contamination was identified in 172 (8.2%) of the 2096 pairs of blood cultures. Multivariate analysis revealed more frequent contamination when puncture sites were disinfected with povidone-iodine (PVI) than with alcohol/chlorhexidine gluconate (adjusted odds ratio, 7.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8–10.7; P < 0.001). Femoral and central venous catheters showed more frequent contamination than peripheral venous sites. Blood collection by first- or second-year residents did not show an increase in contaminated blood cultures. Conclusions : Rates of contaminated blood cultures were significantly associated with PVI and specific sites, but were not significantly associated with blood collection by residents.
microbiology,food science & technology,environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?