Abstract:executive summary: This essay analyzes the impact of recent geopolitical trends on Asia's regional trade and investment order, highlights the rival strategies pursued by China and Japan, and draws some conclusions about the future role of the U.S. main argument The geopolitical foundations supporting Asia's rapid economic growth are weaker than they were at the turn of the millennium. The security environment has deteriorated sharply. Many of the tariffs erected by the Trump administration against imports from China, as well as from allies and friendly countries, are still in place. The most striking feature of the new trade and investment landscape is the emergence of rival regionalisms forged by China and Japan. As they navigate these contrasting initiatives, Asian governments, particularly in Southeast Asia, are exercising new agency and are not likely to relinquish it just because the U.S. claims to be "back." This combination means that the future of Asia's economic order is likely to be a mixture of selective multilateralism, regionalism, and protectionism. policy implications • Japan has become the de facto leader of the emerging economic order in Asia, while China has amassed enormous regional influence. As trade and economic negotiations proceed, the U.S. will have a seat at the table but will no longer sit at the head. • The fastest and most direct way for the U.S. to re-enter the leadership circle would be to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). The Biden administration should slowly and quietly build the case in Congress and with the public for making such a move after the 2022 midterm elections. • The Biden administration should ensure that "foreign policy for the middle class" does not lead to new trade barriers against other nations, especially allies and friends. Selective removal of existing barriers would help restore goodwill. U.S. negotiators should adopt a style of engagement that emphasizes listening to other countries' concerns.

Potential friend-shoring in the Indo-Pacific: why a value-based approach to trade will set Canada back on its Indo-Pacific strategy

How Canada's Indo-Pacific strategy conflicts with ASEAN's outlook on the Indo-Pacific

Non-traditional security cooperation between China and south-east Asia: implications for Indo-Pacific geopolitics

Article: Unraveling Friendshoring in the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity and Forging a Novel Form of Standard Setting

The recalibration of Chinese assertiveness: China's responses to the Indo-Pacific challenge

The US Free and Open Indo-Pacific Strategy: Implications for China (2017-present)

The return of the Indo-Pacific strategy: an assessment

The New Geopolitics of Trade and Investment in Asia: Multilateralism, Regionalism, Protectionism, or All of the Above?

Sitting on the Fence? Australia’s Balancing of the Belt and Road Initiative and Indo-Pacific Strategy in the New Multipolar World System

The Indo-Pacific: The Gauntlet Thrown Down by US, India, Japan and Australia to China’s Asia-Pacific Order

The Political Economy of China’s Rising Role in the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP): Strategies and Instruments of Chinese Way

Indonesia’s Double Hedging Strategy toward the United States–China Competition: Shaping Regional Order in the Indo-Pacific?

Connotation and Dilemma of the US Indo-Pacific Strategy and China’s Responses

The Negotiation Process of Indo-Pacific Economic Framework and Its Alliance Turning

Why US-Sino strategic competition is good for Australia

The Biden Administration’s Indo-Pacific Strategy and China-U.S. Strategic Competition

European Union’s Indo-Pacific Strategy: Policy Implications For India

Contentious Connectivity-the USA, Japan, and the Free and Open Indo-Pacific

Balancing China: Indo-US relations and convergence of their interests in the Indo-Pacific

The economy-security conundrum in American grand strategy: foreign economic policy toward China from Obama to Biden