Abstract:Introduction: The effective techniques of surgical intervention that ensure the desired level of weight reduction outcomes (decreased level of obesity) not always improve QOL outcomes, explained by a range of post-surgery complications. There are the specific complications, strongly impacting the QOL of the patients after bariatric surgery and increasing postoperative comorbidity. Aim: The aim of this retrospective case control study was to evaluate the relative safety of primary LSG performed with standard and modified LSG techniques according to the Clavien-Dindo complication grading system and the rate of long-term complications in patients with BMI>40. Materials and methods: A total of 497 cases of patients were divided into 2 groups in accordance with the type of LSG performed. The first group (n = 246) were the patients managed with the Standard protocol of LSG and the second group (n = 251) included the patients treated with the modified protocol of the LSG. The prevalence of specific post-bariatric complications and short-term (30-days) complications was calculated and compared in the groups. The long-term complications were assessed after 1-year օf post-operation period in both intervention groups. The relative risk ratio, p-value and CI95% were calculated for all complications. The short-term (30-days) complications assessment in both intervention groups was performed in accordance with Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications. Results: The remarkable reduction of relative risks was registered for the minor and major complications rates. Similarly, the total rates for the minor and major complications demonstrated strong difference between group I and group II (p<0,05). Тhe intraoperative and early (first 72 hours) complications (acute bleeding, and leakage) rates in patients of group I were reliably lower compared to the patients of group II (p<0,05). The RR indicators were 0.123 and 0.121 respectively for acute bleeding and leakage. The indicator of acute obstruction was not essentially different while intergroup comparison was significantly divergent (p<.05). However, the RRR was calculated as 80%. The total rate of intraoperative and first 72 hours complications was 7.3% vs 1.2% in group II. The difference was reliable (p-value<.05) in Gall stone disease, GERD, thrombosis malnutrition and anemia. Comparison of the Renal lithiasis and depression didn't reveal any essential difference between clinical groups (p-value>.05). Conclusion: The results we received are direct confirmation of the comparatively higher effectiveness of the modified LSG evidenced by a significant reduction of the major and minor complications in patients with BMI>40.

Medium Term Outcomes of Revision Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy after Gastric Banding: A Propensity Score Matched Study

Five-year outcomes of revisional bariatric surgery: gastric band to sleeve gastrectomy or to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Safety of Revision Sleeve Gastrectomy Compared to Roux-Y Gastric Bypass After Failed Gastric Banding: Analysis of the MBSAQIP

Outcome comparison between primary and revisional bariatric surgery: A propensity-matched analysis

Long-Term Matched Comparison of Adjustable Gastric Banding Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy: Weight Loss, Quality of Life, Hospital Resource Use and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Revisional One-Step Bariatric Surgical Techniques After Unsuccessful Laparoscopic Gastric Band: A Retrospective Cohort Study with 2-Year Follow-up

Long-Term Outcomes 10 Years after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Single Center Retrospective Analysis

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication: a Long-Term Follow-up Study on the Complications, Body Mass Index Changes, Endoscopic Findings and Causes of Revision

Outcomes of primary versus conversional Roux-En-Y gastric bypass after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective propensity score–matched cohort study

Outcomes of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Following Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band: A Propensity Score–matched Analysis

Safety of Redo Sleeve Gastrectomy as a Primary Revisional Procedure

Five-year outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a primary procedure for morbid obesity: A prospective study

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EFFECTS INDUCED BY STANDARD AND MODIFIED LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY PERFORMANCE ON SHORT TERM AND DISTAL COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH 3RD DEGREE OF MORBID OBESITY

Propensity score matched analysis of laparoscopic revisional and conversional sleeve gastrectomy with concurrent hiatal hernia repair

Outcomes of revisional surgery options after inadequate sleeve gastrectomy: A comprehensive network meta‐analysis

Prospective, multicentric, comparative study between sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 277 patients, 3 years follow-up

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy for the Treatment of Morbid Obesity in China: a 5-Year Outcome

Long-Term Weight Loss and Comorbidity Resolution of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and the Impact of Preoperative Weight Loss on Overall Outcome

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity: can it be considered a definitive procedure?

Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Comparative study of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with and without partial enterectomy and omentectomy.