Impact of various cryo-preservation steps on sperm rheotaxis and sperm kinematics in bull

Haitham A. Mofadel,Hassan A. Hussein,Hanan H. Abd-Elhafee,Taymour M. El-Sherry

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61617-y

IF: 4.6

2024-05-19

Scientific Reports

Abstract:Semen cryopreservation is an important tool that has massively contributed to the progression of animal reproduction, especially in cattle. Nonetheless, a large part of the sperm population suffers from cryostress and loses fertility during the process. Although bovine semen cryopreservation is more advanced than any other species, there are still some missing links in the technology knowledge. The aim of the current study was to detect the effect of cryopreservation steps on sperm rheotaxis. Semen samples were collected from sex bulls and analyzed inside a microfluidic platform with CASA after each step of cryopreservation, including control, dilution with yolk citrate, cryoprotectant addition, and cooling or freezing. The results showed that positive rheotaxis % (PR) was not affected during cryopreservation. On the contrary, the sperm kinematics of the positive rheotactic sperm undergo significant changes, as velocity parameters (VCL, VSL, and VAP) were lower in both the cryoprotectant adding and cooling/freezing steps than in the control and yolk citrate dilution steps, while progression parameters (LIN and BCF) were higher in the cryoprotectant and cooling/freezing steps than in the control and yolk citrate dilution steps. Beside these results, an interesting phenomenon of sperm backward positive rheotaxis has been observed. The results of backward sperm rheotaxis samples revealed a significant decrease in PR%, while all sperm kinematics except BCF were significantly higher than normal rheotaxis samples. Based on these results, we conclude that positive rheotactic sperm cells are the elite of the sperm population; however, they still get some sublethal cryodamage, as shown by alterations in sperm kinematics. We also suggest that the sperm-positive rheotaxis mechanism is a mixture of an active and passive process rather than a passive physical one.

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to explore the impact of various steps in the semen cryopreservation process on the rheotaxis and kinematics of bull sperm. Although cryopreservation technology is crucial in animal reproduction, the freezing process can cause some sperm to lose fertility due to cold stress. Researchers analyzed the effects of different steps in the cryopreservation process (including control, addition of egg yolk citrate diluent, addition of cryoprotectant, and cooling or freezing) on sperm rheotaxis and kinematics using a microfluidic platform. The results showed that while the percentage of positive rheotaxis (PR%) was not affected by the cryopreservation process, the kinematic parameters of forward-moving sperm, such as curvilinear velocity (VCL), average path velocity (VAP), and straight-line velocity (VSL), significantly decreased during the addition of cryoprotectant and cooling/freezing steps. In contrast, linearity (LIN) and beat-cross frequency (BCF) exhibited an opposite trend.

Additionally, the study observed an abnormal backward positive rheotaxis in some sperm. These backward-moving sperm had a significantly lower PR% compared to normal sperm but showed significantly higher values in other kinematic parameters, except for BCF. Based on these results, the study concluded that although sperm exhibiting positive rheotaxis are the elite within the sperm population, they still suffer some sublethal damage during the cryopreservation process, as evidenced by changes in kinematic parameters. Furthermore, the mechanism of sperm positive rheotaxis may be a combination of active and passive processes, rather than merely a passive physical process.