Influence of design load determination method for SC-BRBs with trilinear flag-shaped hysteresis behaviour on the seismic performance of braces and structures

Qin Xie,Zhen Zhou,Linjie Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116292

IF: 5.582

2023-05-20

Engineering Structures

Abstract:Self-centering buckling-restrained braces (SC-BRBs) can effectively reduce the residual deformation and seismic damage of the main structure. Because the first loading curve and subsequent loading curve of SC-BRB trilinear flag-shaped hysteresis behaviour do not coincide, there are two ways to determine the design load of a brace, i.e., the design load is taken as either the bearing force F y1 at the first stiffness change point of the first loading curve or the bearing force F y2 at the stiffness change point of the subsequent loading curve. In this study, a numerical analysis method is used to study the differences in the hysteresis performance of braces (i.e., SC-BRB- F y1 and SC-BRB- F y2 ) and the seismic performance of structures (i.e., SCBF- F y1 and SCBF- F y2 ) based on different design load determination methods. The results demonstrate that when the strength ratio β and the first stiffness ratio α c are similar, the hysteresis performance of braces and the seismic performance of structures are basically the same regardless of the method of design load determination. Decreasing β or increasing α c significantly increases the maximum axial force of SC-BRB- F y1 but has little effect on that of SC-BRB- F y2 . Decreasing β can enhance the energy dissipation capacity of braces, reduce the maximum displacement of structures during earthquakes, and reduce the deformation concentration effect of SCBF- F y2 but has no obvious influence on the deformation mode of SCBF- F y1 . Increasing α c can improve the energy dissipation capacity of SC-BRB- F y1 but weaken the energy dissipation capacity of SC-BRB- F y2 , which has the opposite effect on the displacement response of SCBF- F y1 and SCBF- F y2 .

engineering, civil