Abstract:Levelt (1967) found an intriguing relation between the strength of binocular rivalry stimuli and their dominance durations. When one eye's stimulus is strengthened (eg by increasing contrast), the mean dominance duration of that eye does not change; instead, the mean duration of the other (unaffected) eye decreases. This observation imposes significant constraints on models of rivalry. Here we propose that it is particularly useful for testing different accounts of the role of adaptation in rivalry. Adaptation is commonly thought to be involved in bi-stable alternations. But the relative role of a decay in strength of the dominant (perceived) stimulus versus a recovery from adaptation of the suppressed (unperceived) stimulus is not known. We addressed this by examining the duration of the very first dominance epoch. Methods: contrast was manipulated for each eye independently in a full-factorial design. Trials were sorted based on which eye was dominant first, and the mean duration of the first epoch was calculated for each eye. Results: Levelt's observation holds already in the first dominance epoch; the mean duration of the first stimulus seen depended on the contrast of the (as yet unperceived) stimulus projected to the other eye. In the next abstract (Part II, Hupé and Rubin) we present evidence that Levelt's result can be generalized to bi-stable motion displays, and there, too, we find that the effect of the unperceived percept on the dominance duration of the other percept is present already in the first dominance epoch. Conclusions: these results cast a doubt on models which make use of recovery from adaptation of the suppressed stimulus to explain Levelt's result. In the very first dominance epoch, the suppressed stimulus is not yet adapted: it is not only unperceived at that moment — it has not been perceived (dominant) at all yet. These observations impose new, stronger constraints on models of bi-stable perception.

Hierarchical processing underpins competition in tactile perceptual bistability

Cortical Oscillatory Dynamics of Tactile Selective Sensation - for a Novel Type of Somatosensory Brain-computer Interface

A decision-theoretic model of multistability: perceptual switches as internal actions

Which perceptual categories do observers experience during multistable perception?

Burst-dependent Thalamocortical Dynamics Underlie Perceptual Awareness

Dynamical Mechanisms of a Monolayer Binocular Rivalry Model with Fixed and Time-Dependent Stimuli

Can Attention Selectively Bias Bistable Perception? Differences Between Binocular Rivalry and Ambiguous Figures

Nonequilibrium dynamics and thermodynamics provide the underlying physical mechanism of the perceptual rivalry

Stimulus Strength and Dominance Duration in Perceptual Bi-Stability. Part I: the Unperceived Stimulus Affects the Very First Dominance Epoch

Direction-selective modulation of visual motion rivalry by collocated tactile motion

Human Sensory Cortex Structure and Top-Down Controlling Brain Network Determine Individual Differences in Perceptual Alternations.

Tactile stimulations reduce or promote the segregation of auditory streams: psychophysics and modelling

Dissociable Neural Information Dynamics of Perceptual Integration and Differentiation during Bistable Perception

Flexibility and Stability in Sensory Processing Revealed Using Visual-to-Auditory Sensory Substitution

Mechanisms underlying a thalamocortical transformation during active tactile sensation.

Bistable perception, precision and neuromodulation

Neural oscillations promoting perceptual stability and perceptual memory during bistable perception

Multisensory Competition Is Modulated by Sensory Pathway Interactions with Fronto-Sensorimotor and Default-Mode Network Regions

Local Factors Determine the Stabilization of Monocular Ambiguous and Binocular Rivalry Stimuli

Bilateral integration in somatosensory cortex is controlled by behavioral relevance

Inertia and Memory in Ambiguous Visual Perception