Software Citation Implementation Challenges
Daniel S. Katz,Daina Bouquin,Neil P. Chue Hong,Jessica Hausman,Catherine Jones,Daniel Chivvis,Tim Clark,Mercè Crosas,Stephan Druskat,Martin Fenner,Tom Gillespie,Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran,Morane Gruenpeter,Ted Habermann,Robert Haines,Melissa Harrison,Edwin Henneken,Lorraine Hwang,Matthew B. Jones,Alastair A. Kelly,David N. Kennedy,Katrin Leinweber,Fernando Rios,Carly B. Robinson,Ilian Todorov,Mingfang Wu,Qian Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1905.08674
2019-05-21
Abstract:The main output of the FORCE11 Software Citation working group (<a class="link-external link-https" href="https://www.force11.org/group/software-citation-working-group" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>) was a paper on software citation principles (<a class="link-external link-https" href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.86" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>) published in September 2016. This paper laid out a set of six high-level principles for software citation (importance, credit and attribution, unique identification, persistence, accessibility, and specificity) and discussed how they could be used to implement software citation in the scholarly community. In a series of talks and other activities, we have promoted software citation using these increasingly accepted principles. At the time the initial paper was published, we also provided guidance and examples on how to make software citable, though we now realize there are unresolved problems with that guidance. The purpose of this document is to provide an explanation of current issues impacting scholarly attribution of research software, organize updated implementation guidance, and identify where best practices and solutions are still needed.
Computers and Society,Digital Libraries