Abstract:Aim: Research on deception detection has usually been executed in experimental settings in the laboratory. In contrast, the present research investigates deception detection by actual victims and near victims of fraud, as reported in their own words. Materials and methods: Our study is based on a nationally representative survey of 11 types of (mostly) online fraud victimization (N = 2,864). We used qualitative information from actual victims and near victims on why they didn't fall for the fraud, or how, in hindsight, it could have been prevented. Results: The main detection strategies mentioned by near victims (N = 958) were 1) fraud knowledge (69%): these near victims clearly recognized fraud. Other strategies related to fraud knowledge were: noticing mistakes (27.9%), rules and principles about safe conduct (11.7%), and personal knowledge (7.1%). A second type of strategy was distrust (26.1%). A third strategy was 'wise through experience' (1.6%). Finally, a limited number of respondents (7.8%) searched for additional information: they contacted other people (5.5%), sought information online (4%), contacted the fraudster (2.9%), contacted their bank or credit card company (2.2%), or contacted the police (0.2%). Using knowledge as a strategy decreases the probability of victimization by a factor of 0.43. In contrast, all other strategies increased the likelihood of victimization by a factor of 1.6 or more. Strategies generally were uncorrelated, several strategies differed by type of fraud. About 40% of the actual victims (N = 243) believed that their victimization might have been prevented by: 1) seeking information (25.2%), 2) paying more attention (18.9%), 3) a third party doing something (16.2%), 4) following safety rules or principles, like using a safer way of paying or trading (14.4%), or by 5) 'simply not going along with it' (10.8%). Most of these strategies were associated with a higher, not lower, likelihood of victimization. Conclusion: Clearly, knowledge of fraud is the best strategy to avoid fraud victimization. Therefore, a more proactive approach is needed to inform the public about fraud and attackers' modus operandi, so that potential victims already have knowledge of fraud upon encountering it. Just providing information online will not suffice to protect online users.

Analytical reasoning reduces internet fraud susceptibility

Theoretical basis and occurrence of internet fraud victimisation: Based on two systems in decision-making and reasoning

Design Elements that Promote the use of Fake Website Detection Tools

Real or Bogus: Predicting Susceptibility to Phishing with Economic Experiments

In their own words: deception detection by victims and near victims of fraud

Relationships within the Fraud Diamond: The Decision Processes That Influence Fraudulent Intentions in Online Consumer Fraud

The Psychology of Internet Fraud Victimisation: a Systematic Review

A Key Point in Scam Compliance and Warning Compliance in Real Life

Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning

Do smart people have better intuitions?

Understanding Internet Fraud: Denial of Risk Theory Perspective

Mental States: A Key Point in Scam Compliance and Warning Compliance in Real Life

Can adults discriminate between fraudulent and legitimate e-mails? Examining the role of age and prior fraud experience

The Fake News Effect: Experimentally Identifying Motivated Reasoning Using Trust in News

Can Educational Interventions Reduce Susceptibility to Financial Fraud?

FRAUDability: Estimating Users' Susceptibility to Financial Fraud Using Adversarial Machine Learning

When Lying Feels the Right Thing to Do

Explanations Can Reduce Overreliance on AI Systems During Decision-Making

Less is More: Exploiting Social Trust to Increase the Effectiveness of a Deception Attack

Setting Priorities in Behavioral Interventions: An Application to Reducing Phishing Risk

Using a Computational Cognitive Model to Understand Phishing Classification Decisions of Email Users