Strategic Litigation as a Social Advocacy Tool: Using Human Dignity and Non-Discrimination to Outlaw the Unconstitutional Principle of Showing Contribution during the Division of Matrimonial Property Disputes

Kelvin Mbithi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4258257
2022-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:The central thesis of this paper is that marital property should be divided equally among the spouses regardless of contribution. This paper will focus on how strategic litigation can be used to overturn the unconstitutional principle of participation in determining the division of marital property in Kenya. The provision on contribution is introduced vide section 7 of the matrimonial Property Act 2013. The Act in requiring spouses to show contribution is contradictory to the article 45(3) of the Constitution of Kenya which provides for equal rights of spouses during, at the time and the dissolution of the marriage. Property rights in Africa are a contentious issue due to the contention between customary law, religious laws, statutory and constitutional norms. They each pull in different directions, and the result of the clash depends on the forum where the rights are being decided. In Kenya, the courts are currently the forum legally tasked with determining the distribution of property in the event of a divorce. The paper will begin with a review of the meaning of strategic litigation. It will then discuss how women were disenfranchised in the division of the property. This will involve a discussion on the statutes and case law which denied women the right to an equal division of the marital estate. The paper argues that the principles of affirmative action should guide the courts, non-discrimination, justice, and equity set out under Article 10 of the Constitution. It will then review the case of the Federation of Women Lawyers Kenya vs. The Hon. Attorney General and Initiative for Strategic Litigation Africa , which sought to declare section 7 of the marital property act unconstitutional. The paper will show that the approach of arguing that the provision discriminated against women was not strategic since it failed to consider that equity of men and women is a primary principle in the constitution. The paper argues for the use of a strategic litigation approach to securing showing that the statutory law of contribution is unconstitutional since it violates the constitutional principles of indirect discrimination and human dignity by requiring spouses to demonstrate the contribution to the acquisition of marital property.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?