Variability in mammographic images quality evaluation and Predictive factors affecting it

Norsuddin N Mohd,ZX Toh,IN Che Isa,Zain N Mohd

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2022.10.129

2022-12-01

Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences

Abstract:Introduction Performance of radiographers in producing high-quality mammographic images is crucial for the reliable detection of subtle lesions in the breast. This study evaluated the inter- and intra-agreement of PGMI classification system among radiographers and the predictive confounding factors of the variability. Methods A total of 28 radiographers evaluated 30 mammographic cases (120 images) by using the PGMI classification system through an online system. The Fleiss’ Kappa was used to analyze the inter-rater agreement while the intra-class correlation (ICC) was used to measure the intra-rater agreement among radiographers evaluating mammographic image quality using PGMI (Perfect, Good, Moderate, Inadequate) classification system. A multiple regression analysis was used to determine the effect of predictive factors on the inter-variability of image quality scores. Results Poor inter-rater agreement (overall kappa value of 0.10) and moderate intra-rater agreement (ICC value of 0.63) were observed among radiographers evaluating mammographic image quality using PGMI classification system. No significant influence was seen from different age groups, working institution, year of involvement in mammography, education background, the number of cases performed per year, place of recognition PGMI system and frequency of practicing PGMI on the image quality scores among radiographers evaluating mammographic image quality (p>0.05). Conclusion This study found poor inter-rater agreement and moderate intra-rater agreement among radiographers using the PGMI classification system. Although there is no significant influence from the predicting factors, the findings imply that radiographers perceive the image quality of a mammogram differently and inconsistently. Hence, if left unchecked can lead to failure of quality control in mammography. A more robust visual scale needs developing and validating for use in practice.