Abstract:As stated in the European Convention on Hu- man Rights Preamble, the aim of the Council of Europe is the achievement of greater unity between its members through the maintenance and realisation of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms . Nowadays, the European Union includes the majority of the ECHR signatories (27 of 47) and incorporates the key legal instrument of judicial cooperation in criminal matters, namely the European Arrest Warrant Framework Decision . Nevertheless, the possible effects of the EAWFD on the practice of the European Court of Human Rights remain understudied – despite the crucial need to properly balance the enforcement of the principle of mutual recognition and Human Rights protection in the European Union. Since the first attempts to approach the EAWFD, the Strasbourg Court preferred to find the applications inadmissible (Pianese, Monedero Angora, Stapleton) or to establish a very high threshold for establishing a Convention violation within this context (Pirozzi). It will be argued that the newly developing Strasbourg Court’s case-law on the EAWFD (Castano, Bivolaru/Moldovan, Alosa) could potentially mark a new step in the judicial dialogue be- tween two European Courts. In the Castano and Bivolaru/ Moldovan rulings, the ECtHR – for the first time – found that the EU Member States had breached their obligations under Arts . 2 ( ́right to life ́) and 3 ( ́prohibition of torture ́) ECHR within the European Arrest Warrant context (murder/traffick- ing in human beings charges). At the same time, this interpre- tation opens the floor for discussion on potential applicability of other Convention provisions (Arts . 4, 5, 8, 13) to other offences listed in Art . 2(2) of the EAWFD (such as, for instance, corruption, fraud, computer-related crime etc .). Even though the Strasbourg Court has transposed the CJEU’s benchmarks of the EAW refusals legality assessment – i .e . a risk of inhuman or degrading treatment in the requesting State (Aranyosi/Căldăra ru), the EU Member States ́ courts are now forced – de facto – to consider an additional (ECHR-based) criterion for assessing the legality of refusals to execute the European Arrest Warrants. This can arguably pose further questions upon the entry into force of Protocol No. 15 ECHR which aims at the most effective realisation of the ́subsidiarity ́ principle in the European Convention system.

Intersections among EU judicial cooperation instruments and the quest for an advanced and consistent European judicial space: The case of the transfer and surrender of convicts in the EU

Prison Conditions and Judicial Cooperation in the EU – What Future for the European Arrest Warrant?

The EU and Death Penalty Abolition: The Limited Prospects of Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters as an External Policy Tool

EU police and judicial cooperation before the Treaty of Lisbon: strengthening of the weakest link?

The importance of judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the European Union with a special focus on countering EU threats and crime more effectively

Transnational Law Enforcement Cooperation – Fundamental Rights in European Cooperation in Criminal Matters

A right to rehabilitation through transfer or a right to not be transferred? Identifying potential beneficiaries through nationality and residence

The new theatre of the struggle for EU unity: Judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation confronts member state sovereignty

Detention Conditions in the Issuing Member State as a Ground for Non-Execution of the European Arrest Warrant: State of Play and Challenges Ahead

Approximation of criminal sanctions in the European Union: A wild goose chase?

Regulation of cross-border law enforcement: ‘locks’ and ‘dams’ to regional and international flows of policing

Methods of Judicial Cooperation and the Procedure for Enforcement Under International Law; Identifying the Nexus between Theory and Practice

Interplay between European Union criminal law and administrative sanctions: Constituent elements of transposing punitive administrative sanctions into national law

ECHR Preamble vs. the European Arrest Warrant: balancing Human Rights protection and the principle of mutual trust in EU Criminal Law?

The implementation of the CJEU’s Joined Cases Aranyosi and Caldararu by the UK and Irish Courts – A real impact on the protection of fundamental rights in surrender proceedings?

Spelling It Out−Convergence and Divergence in the Judicial Dialogue between cjeu and ECtHR

Effective Judicial Protection and the Regulation Implementing Enhanced Cooperation on the Establishment of the European Public Prosecutor's Office

The Italian Judiciary between Constitution and European Law: Autonomy, Independence, Impartiality and Protection of Rights

The Acquisition of Legal Status by Individuals in Transnational Criminal Proceedings in Europe

Between facts and norms: Testing compliance with Article 8 ECHR in immigration cases

An interpretative analysis of the European ne bis in idem principle through the lens of ECHR, CFR and CISA Provisions: Are three streams flowing in the same channel?