Abstract:A measure of correlation or strength of association between random variables is the correlation coefficient. In scientific research, correlation analysis is most often carried out using various correlation coefficients without explaining why this particular coefficient was chosen and what the resulting value of this coefficient means. The article discusses Spearman correlation coefficient, Kendall correlation coefficient, phi (Yule) correlation coefficient, Cramér’s correlation coefficient, Matthews correlation coefficient, Fechner correlation coefficient, Tschuprow correlation coefficient, rank-biserial correlation coefficient, point-biserial correlation coefficient, as well as association coefficient and contingency coefficient. The criteria for applying each of the coefficients are given. It is shown how to establish the significance (insignificance) of the resulting correlation coefficient. The scales in which the correlated variables should be located for the coefficients under consideration are presented. Spearman rank correlation coefficient and other nonparametric indicators are independent of the distribution law, and that is why they are very useful. They make it possible to measure the contingency between such attributes that cannot be directly measured, but can be expressed by points or other conventional units that allow ranking the sample. The benefit of rank correlation coefficient also lies in the fact that it allows to quickly assess the relationship between attributes regardless of the distribution law. Examples are given and step-by-step application of each coefficient is described. When analyzing scientific research and evaluating the results obtained, the strength of association is most commonly assessed by the correlation coefficient. In this regard, a number of scales are given (Chaddock scale, Cohen scale, Rosenthal scale, Hinkle scale, Evans scale) grading the strength of association for correlation coefficient, both widely recognized and not so well known.

A Comparison of the Pearson, Spearman Rank and Kendall Tau Correlation Coefficients Using Quantitative Variables

Genetic diversity assessment of extant cotton varieties based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis of enlisted DUS traits

On Correlation Coefficients

Comparison of Values of Pearson's and Spearman's Correlation Coefficients on the Same Sets of Data

Nonparametric statistics. Part 3. Correlation coefficients

Effect of the Scale of Quantitative Trait Data on the Representativeness of a Cotton Germplasm Sub-Core Collection

Correlating and predicting psychiatric symptom ratings: Spearman's r versus Kendall's tau correlation

Assessment of Different Genetic Distances in Constructing Cotton Core Subset by Genotypic Values

Pearson's correlation under the scope: Assessment of the efficiency of Pearson's correlation to select predictor variables for linear models

Alternatives to Pearson's and Spearman's Correlation Coefficients

A Short Note on Spearman Correlation: Impact of Tied Observations

Using Spearman's correlation coefficients for exploratory data analysis on big dataset

Comparison of Spearman's rho and Kendall's tau in Normal and Contaminated Normal Models

Measures of Correlation for Multiple Variables

The extension of Pearson correlation coefficient, measuring noise, and selecting features

The Evolution of Pearson's Correlation Coefficient

Different coefficients for studying dependence

Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation

Correlation Coefficients and Semantic Textual Similarity

A Multi-Way Correlation Coefficient

Comparing the Pearson and Spearman Correlation Coefficients Across Distributions and Sample Sizes: A Tutorial Using Simulations and Empirical Data