Abstract:Yu Gao, 1 Yuechi Sun 2 1 School of Psychology, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, People's Republic of China; 2 School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Yu Gao, School of Psychology, Shandong Second Medical University, 7166 Baotong West Street, Weicheng District, Weifang, Shandong, 261053, People's Republic of China, Email Background: Public health emergencies not only threaten the physical and mental health of the public but also trigger a series of risky behaviors of the public, which in turn lead to the emergence or intensification of risk events, disrupting existing economic and social order. Purpose: Based on construal level theory, cognitive appraisal theory of emotions and mood maintenance hypothesis, the study aims to investigate the collectively effect of risk perception and psychological insecurity in the connection between psychological distance and public risky behavior. Participants and Methods: Cross-sectional data was derived from 257 China urban residents. All participants finished the psychological distance scale, risk perception scale, psychological insecurity scale, and risky behavior scale. The research hypothesis was tested using the PROCESS macro. Results: The direct impact of psychological distance on risky behavior was not significant (β=− 0.018, p> 0.05). The indirect impact of psychological distance on risky behavior was significant. In other words, the impact of psychological distance on risky behavior was serially mediated via risk perception and psychological insecurity (β=0.011, 95% CI= [0.0013, 0.025]). Conclusion: Risk perception and psychological insecurity play serial mediating roles in the relationship between psychological distance and public risky behavior. We conclude that during public health emergencies, public health managers should pay extra attention to the risk perception and psychological insecurity level of the public with closer psychological distance, take measures to reduce their risk perception, enhance their psychological security, and reduce their risky behavior, thereby ensuring the physical and mental health of the public and maintaining the stability of economic and social order. Keywords: public health emergencies, psychological distance, risk perception, psychological insecurity, risky behavior Public health emergencies refer to events that seriously damage peoples' health, including major infectious disease epidemics, mass diseases of unknown origin, and major food and occupational poisonings. 2003 SARS, 2014 Ebola epidemic in West Africa, 2020 COVID-19 and 2023 monkeypox epidemic are typical public health emergencies. Such events are characterized by suddenness, instability, uncertainty, mass and infectivity, 1,2 which endangers peoples' physical and mental health as well as induces a series of risky behaviors among the public. For example, panic buying behaviors (such as daily necessities, medical supplies, and food), illegal and criminal behaviors (such as spreading rumors, conspiracy theories, extortion, and violence), self-destructive behaviors (such as excessive drinking, drug abuse, and commit suicide), unhealthy behaviors (such as smoking, sedentary, and a decline in daily physical activity), and boycott epidemic prevention and control behaviors (such as mass gathering of entertainment, deceiving the disease, retaliatory tourism and leisure, participating in activities with a large number of people, and fleeing epidemic areas). 3–8 These risky behaviors will further endanger peoples' physical and mental health, induce the occurrence or aggravation of risk events, disrupt existing economic and social order, and then threaten social stability and national security if not controlled and eliminated in time. 9 Therefore, understanding the intricate causes and process mechanisms of risky behaviors among the public during public health emergencies is of utmost importance and needs to be done promptly. Throughout previous literature, public risky behaviors during public health emergencies have been proven to be related to demographic characteristics, 5,10 personality traits, 11 risk perception, 10 emotions, 3 health literacy, 12 information sources, and the scope of information dissemination. 13 However, people's construct of the same event will be different due to different psychological distances, which in turn can affect their subsequent risky choice. 14 As pointed out by Yang et al, the closer the psychological distance perceived by the public in the context of climate change, the more willi -Abstract Truncated-

Relationship between Risk Perception, Emotion, and Coping Behavior during Public Health Emergencies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Understanding the Emotion Coping Strategies During Public Emergencies – From the Perspective of Psychological Distance

Risk Perception and Sense of Public Health Safety: The Mediating Role of Emotional Perception

Risk perception and coping response to COVID-19 mediated by positive and negative emotions: A study on Chinese college students

The Impact of Risk Awareness on Public's Health Protection Intention in Public Health Emergency

How to Identify Public Risk Perception in Public Health Emergencies and Explore Its Driving Mechanism? an Empirical Analysis in the Xi'an Epidemic

Public perception of risk and coping response to COVID-19 in China: The moderating role of negative emotion

How Does Psychological Distance Influence Public Risky Behavior During Public Health Emergencies

Risk Perception, Cooperation, and Emotional Distress During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Exploring Adaptive Risk Perception

The Impact of Interpersonal Risk Communication on People’s Cognitive Risk Perception and Negative Emotions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mediation and Moderation Model

Risk Perception and Emotion Evaluation of Health Care Workers Varied During Different Periods of COVID-19: a Repeated Cross-Sectional Research

Exploring the relationship between risk perception and public disaster mitigation behavior in geological hazard emergency management: a research study in Wenchuan county

Mechanism of risk perception diffusion in public health emergencies: Based on the dual perspectives of cross‐evolution and emotional difference

Effects of negative emotions and information perceived value on residents' risk perception during the COVID-19 pandemic: An empirical survey from China

Exploring Mechanisms Affecting Environmental Risk Coping Behaviors: Evidence from China

The Relationship Between Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategy and Mental Health Among University Students During Public Health Emergency: A Network Analysis

Exploring the Roles of Fear and Powerlessness in the Relationship Between Perceived Risk of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Information-Avoidance Behavior

How do online users perceive health risks during public health emergencies? Empirical evidence from China

Risk Perception and Emotion Reaction of Chinese Health Care Workers Varied During COVID-19: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Research

Exploring the Dynamic Characteristics of Public Risk Perception and Emotional Expression during the COVID-19 Pandemic on Sina Weibo

Risk Perception and Depression in Public Health Crises: Evidence from the COVID-19 Crisis in China