Abstract:1.IntroductionWith the advent of the distinctive characteristics of academic language , there has been a tremendous methods compatible with the nature of these skills (Abebe,2013). One of these methods is content and language integrated learning (CLIL). It refers to ''both content-based instruction and immersion education by virtue of its Dual focus on language and content'' (Dalton-Puffer,2011,p.182).CLIL is an approach for learning content through foreign language. It can provide opportunities for learners to use their new language skill. It is a competence-based teaching approach which refers to European education systems. The idea is to teach the subject and the language simultaneously. CLIL encourages the use of curricula which promotes the right interpersonal skills, cultural sensitivity , communication ,and language abilities (Schumacher.nd).CLIL instruction changes teacher-centered classroom into student-centered classroom. So ,it leads to more innovation and motivation than traditional instruction. Coyle(2010) claimed that CLIL is not a form of language education or subject education. In fact, it is an innovative combination of both.Marsh (2002) believed that CLIL teachers can pr ovide optimal condition for students' communication. They should be proficient enough in that content area, and they should know the foreign language very well. CLIL teachers must understand the difference between language learning and language acquisition, and they must introduce activities that link language and subject aspects.2. BackgroundKnowing other language is the best tool for openness and mobility which allows people to get to know other culture as well as experience them. It also increases the maturity, consistency and prosperity of society as a whole, giving individuals a genuine freedom.Exposure to foreign language develops affective strategies for grammatical treatment, accent opportunities and lexis acquisition (Bernabe, 2013). While human mind is open to language learning over a lifetime , the relatively recent findings have revealed the ability to learn other languages infancy is optimal. (Brewster, Ellis,& Girad,2004)Teaching and learning through foreign language is not a novel phenomenon. Interests in this matter has recently increased considerably. CLIL attracts educators and researchers, for it may be an ideal environment for achieving good proficiency in second language( Pietilla and Merikivi,2014).The term CLIL was coined by Marsh (1994). He defined CLIL as situations where subjects are taught through a forging language. It has dual- focused aims which are learning of content and learning of foreign language at the same time.In order to run CLIL method in classrooms effectively, Scott and Beadle(2014) suggested conditions for teachers. Teachers should use authentic material , should use scaffolding techniques to reduce the cognitive and linguistic load of context, should create classroom interaction to balance listening and speaking for students, should use appropriate feedback and correction in their classroom, and should use task -based language teaching method that promotes students' interaction.CLIL has three main characteristics that are needed for effective foreign language acquisition in CLIL context : exposure to input, processing of meaning, and language production (Skehan,1998). Learners should expose to input which is compatible and rich. They also process information in order to change them from input into intake,'' the part of input that learners process is called intake''(Corder,1976). So learners process compatible and relevant input to acquire language. The last characteristics is language or output production. It means learners should be able to produce language ( Bernabe, 2013).Besides of these three skills Moate(2010) investigated the social dimension of CLIL approach:From a sociocultural perspective , knowledge is understood as a historically constructed, culturally and socially contextualized entity instantiated in language. …

Content-based instruction model and action-oriented approach in foreign language education

A Comparative Look at the Principles of Communicative and Action-Oriented Approach in Foreign Language Teaching: The Example of "Reflets" and

The Effect of Action-Oriented Approach on Low-Performing Students’ Achievements

The Impact Of Action- Oriented Approach On Teaching English To Students With Mild Specific Language Learning Difficulties

Evaluation of English and Turkish Language Teaching Textbooks According to CEFR Criteria

Developing intercultural competence: a model based on introducing a literary analysis in a foreign language classroom

HISTORY AND MAIN COMPONENTS OF CONTENT AND LANGUAGE INTEGRATED LEARNING APPROACH (CLIL)

Comparing task-based instruction and traditional instruction on task engagement and vocabulary development in secondary language education

Investigation of Iranian and Turkish English language teachers’ views, perspectives and experiences of teaching cultural content in English courses

İngilizce Öğretmenlerinin Bakış Açılarından İçerik ve Dil Entegreli Öğrenme

An Evaluation of the Secondary School Intensive Foreign Language Education

Inquiry-based Learning in the Interdisciplinary IB MYP Language Acquisition Class

Integration of Social Studies and English: Prospective Teachers’ Views “Feeding two birds with one scone?”

The Impact of Content and Languaeg Integrated Learning (Clil) on Efl Learners' Reading Comprehension

Modified Instructional Teaching Method

CASE STUDY: THE DIDACTIC MODEL OF SOCIO-COGNITIVE THEORY OF LEARNING IN THE TEACHING OF ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE. TEACHING STATE AND ACTIVITY VERBS

Investigating Students’ Views Regarding the Effectiveness of Teaching-Learning Processes Developed for 9th Grade English Course

Content and language integrated learning as a means to increase students’ motivation

COMPARISON OF DOMESTIC (KAZAKH) AND FOREIGN METHODS OF TEACHING ENGLISH FOR NON-NATIVE SPEAKERS

Content-Based Instruction and Its Practice in TCFL

The Effects of Content-Based Instruction on the Writing Skills of Iranian Intermediate Efl Learners