Abstract:Bell’s inequality is derived by resorting to a hidden-variable theory devised for resolving the Einstein-Bohr debate on the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics. The legitimacy of quantum superposition for describing the physical world is the essence of the debate. Einstein argued against the legitimacy of quantum superposition. Testing Bell’s inequality by experiments with the experimental results explained by Bell’s theorem opened the door to so-called quantum information technologies. In quantum information theory, “quantum bit” (or “qubit” for short) in a form of quantum superposition is supposed to represent quantum information. In the present paper, a new principle, the general principle of measurements, is introduced and proved as a mathematical theorem. Based on this principle, the experiments for testing Bell’s inequality and so-called experimental evidence for physically realizable “qubit” are scrutinized. The findings are as follows. Although most physicists believe that Einstein’s vision of the physical world contradicts the experimental results of testing Bell’s inequality, actually Einstein’s viewpoint is irrelevant to Bell’s theorem. Bell’s inequality failed to capture the essence of the Einstein-Bohr debate. The experimental results of testing Bell’s inequality and the measurement outcomes of various experiments involving “qubit” are all erroneously explained. Without involving hidden variables, quantum mechanics can be completed based on the general principle of measurements by using disjunction (“or”) as the logical relation between the orthonormal vectors that span an arbitrarily given Hilbert space, and the mathematical setting can remain essentially unchanged. All kinds of “qubit” violate the general principle of measurements and can only describe imaginary objects that do not exist in the real world. A very regrettable conclusion from the above findings is inevitable: Quantum information has no physical carriers, and all quantum information technologies are not physically realizable.

If AI machine cannot think, can QI machine think?—from negative numbers to quantum intelligence for mind-light-matter unity

Ground-0 Axioms vs. First Principles and Second Law: From the Geometry of Light and Logic of Photon to Mind-Light-Matter Unity-AI&QI

Zero and Metaphysic- Thoughts about Being and Nothing from Mathematics,Buddhism, Daoism to Phenomenology

Quantum Mathematics in Artificial Intelligence

Quantum Reasoning using Lie Algebra for Everyday Life (and AI perhaps...)

The purpose of qualia: What if human thinking is not (only) information processing?

Turing's Test, a Beautiful Thought Experiment

Quo vadis artificial intelligence?

Can AI have common sense? Finding out will be key to achieving machine intelligence

Noncommutative Number Systems for Quantum Information

A "thoughtful" Local Friendliness no-go theorem: a prospective experiment with new assumptions to suit

Quantum Machine Learning: Bridging Quantum Computing and Artificial Intelligence

On Purported Physical Realizations of So-called Quantum Information Technologies

On the Negation of discrete Z-numbers

Quantum Computation, Quantum Theory and AI

Can Turing machine be curious about its Turing test results? Three informal lectures on physics of intelligence

QZNs: Quantum Z-numbers

Design of quantum optical experiments with logic artificial intelligence

Quantum Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey

Itinerant Quantum Integers: The Language of Quantum Computers

Two Philosophical Approaches in Quantum Information Research