Cognitive Reserve and Age‐Related Decline in Cognitive and Gait Domains: Results from the LonGenity Study
Helena M Blumen,Shanika Oshadi Jayakody,Ayers Emmeline,Nir Barzilai,Sofiya Milman,Erica Weiss,Joe Verghese
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.079843
2023-12-01
Abstract:Abstract Background Individuals with high cognitive reserve (CR) can adapt to dementia‐related brain changes and delay the onset of cognitive impairment and dementia. High CR is accumulated from frequent participation in cognitive, physical, and social activities. Whether high CR protects against age‐related cognitive and gait decline, however, is not well‐understood. We have shown that high CR is associated with a slower rate of age‐related cognitive decline, but not gait speed decline. Here, we examined associations between cognitive, physical, and social CR proxies and age‐related decline in different cognitive (processing speed, memory, and executive function) and gait (pace, rhythm, and variability) domains. Method Up to 12 years of cognitive and gait data from 1,079 older (75.4±6.7 years; 56.0% women) LonGenity study participants were examined. Three cognitive domains – processing speed (trails A, digit‐symbol substitution), memory (free recall, logical memory) executive function (trails B‐A, digit span) – and three gait domains – pace (gait speed, step length), rhythm (step time, swing time) and variability (step‐time variability, step‐length variability) – were derived with principal components analyses. Cognitive (years of education), physical (blocks walked daily; weekly physical activity), and social (working/volunteering, living with someone) CR proxies were obtained from self‐report at baseline. Linear mixed‐effects models were adjusted for sex, parental longevity, baseline cognitive impairment, and comorbidities. Result Higher CR when assessed with any CR proxy (except weekly physical activity) slowed the rate of decline in processing speed. Higher weekly physical activity and more years of education slowed the rate of decline in executive function. Higher number of blocks walked daily slowed the rate of decline in memory. No CR proxies were associated with pace and variability gait domains. Higher social CR when assessed with working/volunteering, however, slowed the rate of increases (worsening) in rhythm. Conclusion These findings suggest that CR is associated with age‐related decline in several cognitive domains (processing speed, memory, and executive function) and select gait domains (rhythm) – yet the protective effects of cognitive, physical, and social CR on cognitive and gait domain decline are not uniform. Future research is needed to confirm these initial observations and develop interventions for domain‐specific decline in cognition and gait.
clinical neurology